RFC: Reserve unprefixed guarded string literals in Edition 2024 by pitaj · Pull...
source link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3593
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
added the T-lang Relevant to the language subteam, which will review and decide on the RFC. label
added the I-lang-nominated Indicates that an issue has been nominated for prioritizing at the next lang team meeting. label
Member
|
Very much in favor of reserving this syntax. Starting an FCP so we can check for consensus asynchronously, in addition to discussing this at a future meeting. @rfcbot merge |
|
Team member @joshtriplett has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: No concerns currently listed. Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! cc @rust-lang/lang-advisors: FCP proposed for lang, please feel free to register concerns. |
added proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of all team members in order to enter the final comment period. disposition-merge This RFC is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it.
labels
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
No reviews
No one assigned
None yet
No milestone
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
None yet
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK