

Teach MIR inliner query cycle avoidance about const_eval_select by saethlin · Pu...
source link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123444
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Conversation
Member
Fixes #122659
r? tmiasko
Collaborator
rustbot has assigned @michaelwoerister. Use |
added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Collaborator
Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt |
Member
Author
This comment has been minimized.
added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label
Contributor
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
Collaborator
Finished benchmarking commit (81b9b53): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResults Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 669.809s -> 667.914s (-0.28%) |
removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label
Contributor
Thanks. |
added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Contributor
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Collaborator
Finished benchmarking commit (c0ddaef): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results CyclesResults Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 667.384s -> 669.462s (0.31%) |
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
No reviews
None yet
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Removing cold/inline(never) from slice_error_fail causes a cycle error
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK