1

Hackaday Podcast Episode 264: Cheap Minimills, 65-in-1 Electronics, And Time On...

 1 month ago
source link: https://hackaday.com/2024/03/29/hackaday-podcast-episode-264-cheap-minimills-65-in-1-electronics-and-time-on-moon/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Hackaday Podcast Episode 264: Cheap Minimills, 65-in-1 Electronics, And Time On Moon

382cd2e2ece26c65e289cf5970780cb6.gif

Skip to content

Hackaday Podcast Episode 264: Cheap Minimills, 65-in-1 Electronics, And Time On Moon

microphone.jpg?w=800

It was Dan’s turn behind the mic with Elliot this time as we uncovered the latest from the world of hacking, and what an eclectic mix it was. It was slightly heavy on machining, with a look at mini-mills that are better than nothing, and a DIY DRO that’s A-OK. We also kicked the nostalgia bucket over — whatever that means — and got a new twist on the old “65-in-1” concept, found hidden code in 80s music, and looked at color TV in the US and how it got that way. We’ve got ample alliteration about grep, thoughts about telling time on the Moon, and what does Canada have against the poor Flipper Zero, anyway?

Grab a copy for yourself if you want to listen offline.

Episode 264 Show Notes:

News:

What’s that Sound?

Interesting Hacks of the Week:

Quick Hacks:

Can’t-Miss Articles:

Posted in Hackaday Columns, Podcasts, SliderTagged Hackaday Podcast

Post navigation

ad28723c30f53707308afacb07b0e350.png

5 thoughts on “Hackaday Podcast Episode 264: Cheap Minimills, 65-in-1 Electronics, And Time On Moon”

  1. Dude says:

    One “un”-intended advantage of how color TV was engineered back in the day: when the reception goes down, you’ll still be able to make out the B&W signal even if the color carrier is messed up. The signal would degrade more gracefully. Instead of getting a whole bunch of colorful static, you had a little bit of static and the image would de-saturate. The effect on signal quality was far less noticeable.

    1. Was it unintended?

      Because, as you say, the split into brightness, hue, and saturation is very useful even today. YUV encoding with most of your bit depth in the Y channel is surprisingly effective.

      1. Dude says:

        Well, first and foremost, it was the system they had to build around. Brightness was first and it had to be there, and it got the most bandwidth because of how the old system worked.

        So the fact that they had to make it backwards compatible also had the lucky coincidence that it became more fault tolerant. If they had designed it all over, they probably would have put equal emphasis on the color information to get better fidelity out of it, with the consequence that degrading signal quality would degrade the entire picture rather than just the color.

      2. Dude says:

        More to the point, the idea of splitting the information into YUV came from that experience. We now know that it’s a good idea, because of how well it turned out back then.

  2. Listening now

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

ad28723c30f53707308afacb07b0e350.png

Search

Search for:

Subscribe

By using our website and services, you expressly agree to the placement of our performance, functionality and advertising cookies. Learn more

g.gif?v=ext&blog=156670177&post=671490&tz=-7&srv=hackaday.com&hp=vip&j=1%3A13.2.2&host=hackaday.com&ref=&fcp=1296&rand=0.6628817395929727


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK