Ignore paths from expansion in `unused_qualifications` by Alexendoo · Pull Reque...
source link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122545
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Conversation
Member
If any of the path segments are from an expansion the lint is skipped currently, but a path from an expansion where all of the segments are passed in would not be. Doesn't seem that likely to occur but it could happen
Collaborator
|
rustbot has assigned @michaelwoerister. Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer |
added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
This comment was marked as resolved.
|
Thanks for the PR, @Alexendoo! This looks sensible to me, but r? @petrochenkov for double checking. |
Contributor
|
I don't think it's possible to construct a path with such span, except by AST-based built-in macros. |
added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
No reviews
None yet
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
None yet
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK