1

Settlement forces SmileDirectClub to release 17,000 customers from NDAs - The Ve...

 11 months ago
source link: https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/23/23771112/smile-direct-club-dental-retainers-nda-customer-refunds
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

SmileDirectClub forced to drop NDAs blocking customers from leaving bad reviews

/

A settlement requires the company to stop making dissatisfied customers sign NDAs in order to receive refunds.

By Jess Weatherbed, a news writer focused on creative industries, computing, and internet culture. Jess started her career at TechRadar, covering news and hardware reviews.

Jun 23, 2023, 2:07 PM UTC|

Share this story

A clear dental retainer from SmileDirectClub in a purple case, resting on a bathroom sink.
Several thousand disgruntled SmileDirectClub customers are almost certainly smiling now.Image: SmileDirectClub

SmileDirectClub, a mail-order orthodontic provider that sells cheap teeth aligners online, has agreed to release 17,000 US customers dissatisfied with its service from nondisclosure agreements that prohibited them from leaving negative reviews as part of a settlement with the District of Columbia’s attorney general. Announced on Thursday, the settlement requires SmileDirectClub to make changes to the company’s refund guarantee policy and inform customers who had signed such NDAs that they were now free to discuss their experiences.

A report from The New York Times back in 2020 revealed that SmileDirectClub had asked customers requesting a refund beyond the company’s 30-day guarantee policy to sign an NDA promising that they “will not make, publish, or communicate any statements or opinions” about SmileDirectClub’s employees, officers, directors, products, or services that make them look bad.

“SmileDirectClub promised a simple, safe, and affordable way to straighten teeth and touted five-star reviews,” said Attorney General Brian L. Schwalb in a statement. “But behind the scenes, the company silenced dissatisfied consumers and buried complaints about injuries caused by its products.”

SmileDirectClub is also required to pay $500,00 for violating DC consumer protection laws under the settlement, though the company denies having violated any laws or engaged in any deceptive or unfair practices within the document. In its own statement addressing the verdict, SmileDirectClub claims that it had based its release form on one “historically used in the industry” and that the company already had plans to “tailor the non-disclosure provision more narrowly.” According to SmileDirectClub, the litigation “gave the Company an opportunity to address both that campaign and the lawsuit at the same time.”


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK