8

14" MBP: Is it better to connect a display over Thunderbolt or HDMI?

 1 year ago
source link: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/14-mbp-is-it-better-to-connect-a-display-over-thunderbolt-or-hdmi.2348368/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

14" MBP: Is it better to connect a display over Thunderbolt or HDMI?

izzy0242mr

macrumors regular

Original poster

Jul 24, 2009
I have ports for both so I'm just curious if there's a real advantage to one over the other, assuming a monitor supports both. Or if monitors that only support HDMI might be cheaper.

fwmireault

Contributor
Jul 4, 2019 1,184 4,836 Montreal, Canada
Depending of the monitor, Thunderbolt can charge your MacBook with the same cable for video transfer, so you can always have only one cable solution to connect to a monitor. HDMI doesn’t provide power to the host computer. Also, Thunderbolt has more bandwidth than HDMI (assuming you don’t have HDMI 2.1 on your monitor), and the port is just more versatile in general than HDMI. I’d go with Thunderbolt

jav6454

macrumors Core
Nov 14, 2007 19,867 4,107 1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
Depends on which connector your display supports.

izzy0242mr

macrumors regular

Original poster

Jul 24, 2009
Depending of the monitor, Thunderbolt can charge your MacBook with the same cable for video transfer, so you can always have only one cable solution to connect to a monitor. HDMI doesn’t provide power to the host computer. Also, Thunderbolt has more bandwidth than HDMI (assuming you don’t have HDMI 2.1 on your monitor), and the port is just more versatile in general than HDMI. I’d go with Thunderbolt
That's what I'm leaning, too. Charging ability is nice.

The MBP doesn't have HDMI 2.1, just 2.0, so I'm assuming that a monitor with HDMI 2.1 can't realize those benefits?

What's the benefit of "more bandwidth," exactly? Faster response times? I'd be using the monitor mostly for office work, but also some videos and gaming.

izzy0242mr

macrumors regular

Original poster

Jul 24, 2009
Depends on which connector your display supports.
Well I haven't bought one yet, so I can get one that supports either or both. I'm trying to figure out if there's a significant advantage to one over the other.

jav6454

macrumors Core
Nov 14, 2007 19,867 4,107 1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
Well I haven't bought one yet, so I can get one that supports either or both. I'm trying to figure out if there's a significant advantage to one over the other.
Like @fwmireault stated, the only advantage a Thunderbolt connected display might bring if it allows pass thru charging. Other than that, none.

aevan

macrumors 68040
Feb 5, 2015 3,940 5,972 Serbia
One thing to also consider, a Thunderbolt/USB-C monitor can be connected from either side of your Mac, unlike the HDMI. The cable is also reversible (no up and down side) so it's easier to plug in. HDMI cables also tend to be thicker. As others have said, USB-C monitor can also charge your Mac.

jav6454

macrumors Core
Nov 14, 2007 19,867 4,107 1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
One thing to also consider, a Thunderbolt/USB-C monitor can be connected from either side of your Mac. As others have said, it can also charge your Mac.
Agreed, but the monitor has to support the standard of pass-thru charge for it to happen. Which, if my memory serves right it's almost all.

izzy0242mr

macrumors regular

Original poster

Jul 24, 2009
Agreed, but the monitor has to support the standard of pass-thru charge for it to happen. Which, if my memory serves right it's almost all.
Yeah, if I go that route I'll just have to confirm that functionality works on the monitor.

About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK