NOTE: Riemann integral
source link: https://dannypsnl.github.io/blog/2022/06/03/math/riemann-integral/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
NOTE: Riemann integral
Riemann integral is a good start for learning integral as the first rigorous definition of integral on an interval.
Definition
Part 1
Let f(x)f(x)f(x) be a continuous function on the interval [a,b][a, b][a,b], we can make a mmm cut(m∈Nm \in \mathbb{N}m∈N) to get m+1m+1m+1 points on [a,b][a, b][a,b], they will be a series Δ=x0,x1,x2,x3,...,xm−1,xm\Delta = x_0, x_1, x_2, x_3, ..., x_{m-1}, x_mΔ=x0,x1,x2,x3,...,xm−1,xm. This series follows the following rule:
These points split [a,b][a, b][a,b] into mmm subintervals [xk−1,xk][x_{k-1}, x_k][xk−1,xk], where k=1,2,3,...,mk = 1, 2, 3, ..., mk=1,2,3,...,m. Now, forall kkk we pick a ξk\xi_kξk that xk−1≤ξk≤xkx_{k-1} \le \xi_k \le x_kxk−1≤ξk≤xk, make a retangle with width is xk−xk−1x_k - x_{k-1}xk−xk−1 and height is f(ξk)f(\xi_k)f(ξk). Thus, we can collect all retangles' area sum via the following formula:
By the max-min theorem, we can know there have MkM_kMk and μk\mu_kμk for f(x)f(x)f(x)'s max and min value on [xk−1,xk][x_{k-1}, x_k][xk−1,xk]. As above sum of retangle's area, but for MkM_kMk and μk\mu_kμk(they are kind of ξk\xi_kξk of course), we have the following two formulas
-
Maximum SΔS\DeltaSΔ
SΔ=∑k=1mMk(xk−xk−1)S\Delta = \sum_{k=1}^{m} M_k(x_k-x_{k-1})SΔ=k=1∑mMk(xk−xk−1) -
and Minimum sΔs\DeltasΔ
sΔ=∑k=1mμk(xk−xk−1)s\Delta = \sum_{k=1}^{m} \mu_k(x_k-x_{k-1})sΔ=k=1∑mμk(xk−xk−1)
Since
, we know
Part 2
We know f(x)f(x)f(x) is uniformly continuous on [a,b][a, b][a,b]. So, for any ϵ∈R+\epsilon \in \mathbb{R}^+ϵ∈R+, exists a δ(ϵ)∈R+\delta(\epsilon) \in \mathbb{R}^+δ(ϵ)∈R+, let arbitrary two points xxx and x′x'x′, if the following formula is true
is true. And since
- μk=f(αk)\mu_k = f(\alpha_k)μk=f(αk)
- Mk=f(βk)M_k = f(\beta_k)Mk=f(βk)
- xk−1≤αk≤xkx_{k-1} \le \alpha_k \le x_kxk−1≤αk≤xk
- xk−1≤βk≤xkx_{k-1} \le \beta_k \le x_kxk−1≤βk≤xk
If xk−xk−1<δ(ϵ)x_k - x_{k-1} \lt \delta(\epsilon)xk−xk−1<δ(ϵ), then Mk−μk<ϵM_k - \mu_k \lt \epsilonMk−μk<ϵ. Thus, if we write the maximum value of interval's length as the follow(notice xk−xk−1x_k - x_{k-1}xk−xk−1 can be different for different kkk, since we didn't require same length for these subintervals):
Then once δ[Δ]<δ(ϵ)\delta[\Delta] \lt \delta(\epsilon)δ[Δ]<δ(ϵ), we have
Now, make a new ϵ′=ϵ/(b−a)\epsilon' = \epsilon/(b - a)ϵ′=ϵ/(b−a), we have δ(ϵ′)\delta(\epsilon')δ(ϵ′) that if δ[Δ]<δ(ϵ′)\delta[\Delta] \lt \delta(\epsilon')δ[Δ]<δ(ϵ′) then SΔ−sΔ<ϵ′S\Delta - s\Delta \lt \epsilon'SΔ−sΔ<ϵ′. Since ϵ′∈R\epsilon' \in \mathbb{R}ϵ′∈R, we can rewrite to δ[Δ]<δ(ϵ)\delta[\Delta] \lt \delta(\epsilon)δ[Δ]<δ(ϵ) then SΔ−sΔ<ϵS\Delta - s\Delta \lt \epsilonSΔ−sΔ<ϵ.
Part 3
We have a parition Δ\DeltaΔ, using the same way can get another parition Δ′\Delta'Δ′, their union is another parition Δ′′\Delta''Δ′′. Of course, there will also have σΔ\sigma\DeltaσΔ, σΔ′\sigma\Delta'σΔ′, and σΔ′′\sigma\Delta''σΔ′′ as sum of retangles from paritions.
Now, it's easy to find, Δ′′=x0′′,x1′′,x2′′,...,xp′′\Delta'' = x_0'', x_1'', x_2'', ..., x_p''Δ′′=x0′′,x1′′,x2′′,...,xp′′ can parition any [xk−1,xk][x_{k-1}, x_k][xk−1,xk] in Δ\DeltaΔ. Remember μk\mu_kμk is the minimum value of f(x)f(x)f(x) in [xk−1,xk][x_{k-1}, x_k][xk−1,xk], so μk≤f(ξp′′)\mu_k \le f(\xi_p'')μk≤f(ξp′′), where ξp′′∈Δ′′\xi_p'' \in \Delta''ξp′′∈Δ′′. Then mapping xh′′=xk−1x_h'' = x_{k-1}xh′′=xk−1 and xj′′=xkx_j'' = x_kxj′′=xk. Thus, we get
We conclude
Now consider SΔ′S\Delta'SΔ′, we know σΔ′′≤SΔ′\sigma\Delta'' \le S\Delta'σΔ′′≤SΔ′ via same process, conclude
Let's consider all partitions Δ\DeltaΔ of [a,b][a, b][a,b], the corresponding sΔs\DeltasΔ of has a supremum
Obviously, s≤SΔ′s \le S\Delta's≤SΔ′, and since Δ′\Delta'Δ′ can be arbitrary parition so
Combine part 1 and part 2, conclude if δ[Δ]<δ(ϵ)\delta[\Delta] \lt \delta(\epsilon)δ[Δ]<δ(ϵ), then ∣σΔ−s∣<ϵ|\sigma\Delta - s| \lt \epsilon∣σΔ−s∣<ϵ.
Final
Now we can say for any partition, whatever how we pick ξk\xi_kξk for a partition Δ\DeltaΔ, we have
When δ[Δ]→0\delta[\Delta] \rightarrow 0δ[Δ]→0, say σ[Δ]=∑k=1mf(ξk)(xk−xk−1)\sigma[\Delta] = \sum_{k=1}^{m}f(\xi_k)(x_k - x_{k-1})σ[Δ]=∑k=1mf(ξk)(xk−xk−1) has limit sss, write as
We call it the definite integral of f(x)f(x)f(x) on [a,b][a, b][a,b], represent as
Vocabulary
- f(x)f(x)f(x) is the integrand of ∫abf(x)dx\int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx∫abf(x)dx
- ∫abf(x)dx\int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx∫abf(x)dx called the integrate of f(x)f(x)f(x) from aaa to bbb
- aaa and bbb called the lower and upper limit of the definite integral
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK