5

How open source licenses increase or curtail reach of the software

 1 year ago
source link: https://dirkriehle.com/2024/02/12/how-open-source-licenses-increase-or-curtail-reach-of-the-software/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

How open source licenses increase or curtail reach of the software

10199-singapore-zoo-night-safari-sign.jpg

Relicensing from a permissive to a copyleft license curtails the potential reach of the open-source software, while relicensing from a copyleft to a permissive license increases its potential reach. In the abstract, this is easy to see: Having less requirements on the use of the software allows more uses and hence increases reach.

The confusion, as shown in the discussion around the relicensing of Immich, stems from conflating two types of users into one, and then talking past each other because the two opposing factions are talking about different things.

The two users of open-source software are:

  1. End-users simply use the software for its intended purpose. The software typically is an application then (sometimes a component if you create your own application from it).
  2. Distributors enhance the software with a closed complement (hardware or software or service or a combination thereof) that they pass on to third parties (their end-users).

There are no restrictions on end-users: They can just use the software. It doesn’t matter whether it comes with a permissive or copyleft license.

However, for a distributor, a copyleft license makes it impossible to sell further software as a closed complement (i.e. a vendor who enhances the open-source software with some proprietary modification or enhancement). Hence, vendors with this business model will simply not use copyleft-licensed software, cutting off its further distribution and reach. It is that simple.

People sometimes argue that a copyleft license will appeal to more developers and hence will increase its actual reach, even though its potential reach is lower than that of a permissive license. This argument hinges on the assumption that developers prefer copyleft licenses over permissive licenses, which is not true, as the rapid growth of the use of permissive licenses over copyleft licenses shows (local screenshot copy). (Compare this with 2014 data when the GPL was still dominant.)

If you are an open source programmer and want your software to go far, use a permissive license. If you are a vendor who wants to curtail specific competing uses, or a private person who wants to prevent the described specific commercial use, use a copyleft license.

Posted on

2024-02-12

Comments

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Joy

Share on LinkedIn

Share by email

Share on Twitter / X

Share on WhatsApp

Featured Startups

QDAcity makes qualitative research and qualitative data analysis fun and easy.editive-logo.pngEDITIVE makes inter- and intra-company document collaboration more effective.

Featured Projects

Making free and open data easy, safe, and reliable to useBringing business intelligence to engineering managementMaking open source in products easy, safe, and fun to use


report

Recommend

About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK