

Plane crashes and radiation overdoses: UX’s failure to be reflective
source link: https://uxdesign.cc/plane-crashes-and-radiation-overdoses-uxs-failure-to-be-reflective-2d284a6f4826
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Plane crashes and radiation overdoses: UX’s failure to be reflective
Many things can go wrong in high-risk systems. To prevent these errors, it’s crucial to apply our understanding of human behaviour to the systems people utilise. In this discussion, we’ll look into two significant case studies: Therac-25, a computer-controlled radiation therapy machine, and Air Inter Flight 148, a scheduled passenger flight. These distinct events underscore the significance of integrating human behaviour knowledge into system design.
Usability Heuristics
If you are a UX designer then you will probably be familiar with Nielsen's (1994) list of usability heuristics for interaction design.
Let’s talk about a few of these:
- Visibility of System Status: Users should always be informed about what is happening through appropriate feedback within a reasonable amount of time.
- Match Between System and the Real World: The system’s language and concepts should match the user’s mental model and real-world experiences.
- Error Prevention: The design should aim to prevent errors by making it difficult for users to make mistakes or choose incorrect options.
User testing and feedback are essential to guarantee practical usability in real-world situations. However, the true importance of these heuristics becomes strikingly apparent when the consequences of their absence come to light.
Dual Process Theory
As usability heuristics highlight the importance of matching users’ mental models, we will look further at one of these models.
The dual process theory has been developed and expanded upon by various psychologists, including Keith Stanovich, Richard West, and Jonathan Evans. This model divides thinking into two main processes: “System 1” and “System 2”. These terms are used to describe two distinct modes of cognitive processing that our brain engages in.
Let’s talk about these terms:
- System 1 (Immediate/Routine Thinking): This thinking is fast, automatic, and operates largely…
Recommend
-
149
-
62
When performing reflective access to default methods in Java, Google seems to fail us. The solutions presented on Stack Overflow, for instance, seem to work only in a certain set of cases, and not on all Java versions. This article will illustra...
-
56
README.rst Reflective Polymorphism This project provides various utilities for the self-modification of PE images with the intention that they can be incorporated into external projects.
-
33
Key Takeaways We should focus on the big picture The most important person is the user NOT the developer Software Development is a team sport (Good...
-
43
-
43
README.md wise_enum Because reflection makes you wise, not smart wise_enum is a standalone smart enum li...
-
8
AbstractRecent research has shown an association between monthly law enforcement drug seizure events and accidental drug overdose deaths using cross-sectional data in a single state, whereby increased seizures correla...
-
6
At least 68 dead as plane crashes less tha...
-
6
'Apparently Our Plane Bumped Into Another One:' JetBlue Flight Crashes Into Parked Aircraft Before Takeoff The fight was en route to San Juan, Puerto Rico before the collision. ...
-
6
Age-Period-Cohort graphs for suicide and drug overdoses When I still taught advanced research methods for PhD students, I debated on having a section on age-period-cohort (APC) analysis. Part of the reason I did not bother with that...
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK