Implement `AsHandle`/`AsSocket` for `Arc`/`Rc`/`Box` on Windows by sunfishcode ·...

r? @cuviper

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

• Stabilizing library features
• Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
• Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
• Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
• Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs
r? libs-api

This seems like the logical follow up to #97437 and #107317, but since this does affect the public API:

@rfcbot merge

Team member @m-ou-se has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above.

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

This will be merged soon.

@bors r+

Commit a117c50 has been approved by dtolnay

It is now in the queue for this repository.

Testing commit a117c50 with merge a14d696...

Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: dtolnay
Pushing a14d696 to master...

Finished benchmarking commit (a14d696): comparison URL.

Overall result: regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean	range	count
Regressions (primary)	0.5%	[0.5%, 0.5%]	1
Regressions (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements (secondary)	-	-	0
All (primary)	0.5%	[0.5%, 0.5%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 642.75s -> 642.634s (-0.02%)