9

AI-Imager Midjourney v5 Stuns With Photorealistic Images - Slashdot

 2 years ago
source link: https://slashdot.org/story/23/03/17/1712242/ai-imager-midjourney-v5-stuns-with-photorealistic-images
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

AI-Imager Midjourney v5 Stuns With Photorealistic Images

Do you develop on GitHub? You can keep using GitHub but automatically sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with this tool so your projects have a backup location, and get your project in front of SourceForge's nearly 30 million monthly users. It takes less than a minute. Get new users downloading your project releases today!Sign up for the Slashdot newsletter! or check out the new Slashdot job board to browse remote jobs or jobs in your area.
×
Midjourney announced version 5 of its commercial AI image-synthesis service, which can produce photorealistic images at a quality level that some AI art fans are calling creepy and "too perfect." From a report: Midjourney v5 is available now as an alpha test for customers who subscribe to the Midjourney service, which is available through Discord. "MJ v5 currently feels to me like finally getting glasses after ignoring bad eyesight for a little bit too long," said Julie Wieland, a graphic designer who often shares her Midjourney creations on Twitter. "Suddenly you see everything in 4k, it feels weirdly overwhelming but also amazing." Wieland shared some of her Midjourney v5 generations with Ars Technica [images shared in the linked story], and they certainly show a progression in image detail since Midjourney first arrived in March 2022. Version 3 debuted in August, and version 4 debuted in November. Midjourney works similarly to image synthesizers like Stable Diffusion and DALL-E in that it generates images based on text descriptions called "prompts" using an AI model trained on millions of works of human-made art. Recently, Midjourney was at the heart of a copyright controversy regarding a comic book that used earlier versions of the service.

Do you have a GitHub project? Now you can sync your releases automatically with SourceForge and take advantage of both platforms. Do you have a GitHub project? Now you can automatically sync your releases to SourceForge & take advantage of both platforms. The GitHub Import Tool allows you to quickly & easily import your GitHub project repos, releases, issues, & wiki to SourceForge with a few clicks. Then your future releases will be synced to SourceForge automatically. Your project will reach over 35 million more people per month and you’ll get detailed download statistics. Sync Now

URPM and other models hosted on civit.ai can achieve these levels of realism, or almost as good.

As an ageing greybeard, I'm not sure I can cope with this barrage of Machine learning advancement anymore.
I've tried to stay up to date, but I actively fear what is happening in tech now.

We're already in a place where it is close to impossible to have any trust in what we are told, unless we witness it with our own eyes.
Arguably, we've always been there and it's just a case of picking a version of truth via multiple sources that are similar - assuming you bother to DYOR.

We've had hyper-realistic images of humans for years - heck, since the 1960's and the super realism art movement, but that required extreme skill.
Now, anyone with access to software, can generate photographs of humans so convincing, they look real - even on second, third or fourth look.

Video will be next. Again, with video, the ability to doctor video has been around pretty much since its inception - if you were skilled.
Soon, anyone will be able to do it via a text description.

Music, art, homework, coding - you name it - all rapidly heading toward the fingertips of anyone, to create instantly.

There will be no truth. There will be no privacy. There will be no skills left for humans to excel at - what's the point, when it can be generated in seconds?

Head to the wilderness, just switch it all off. The wilderness of your own mind, away from all of this - throw out the damn computers.

I'm just glad I've managed to hit my 50's with gainful employment as a skilled worker - I think it highly unlikely I will have a job in my industry a decade from now.

Time to plan an exit...

  • Re:

    I honestly am concerned about deepfakes. I think a lot more media will need to start using "chain of trust" technologies like SSL and certificate authorities that we use to secure financial information over the web - go ahead and argue that it's not perfect, but it has in practice allowed us to conduct trillions of dollars in online commerce every year with so far manageable levels of loss.

    Even so, still worried. When it comes down to it, how 'realistic' or well-produced something is weighs heavily in h

    • Re:

      Be happy that for now, AI generative tools suck at video coherence.

      Be unhappy that lots of people (myself included) are working to change that situation.

    • Re:

      The challenge is that doesn't work so well because most of the most important imagery would explicitly *not* be endorsed by the subject matter. So random citizen snaps a video of an important person knocking over someone in a wheelchair, and the best you can hope for is that you can prove that the random citizen vouches for the picture. It's not like the important person is going to sign it.

      Now you could have camera equipment sign the pictures to prove raw, but you can have an analog hole to start having

      • Re:

        Have you ever been to reddit? How it works is somebody posts a picture with an inflammatory 1-sentence narrative, which may be real or fake. Then thousands of respondents take turns amplifying each others' response by phrasing it a little better, by explaining to everybody what the villain was thinking at the time (according to their own imagination), etc. etc. This goes on all day every day. Then maybe 500 posts down somebody points out the same picture has been posted 5 times in the last year always w
  • Re:

    Easy there, geriatric doomsayer. For people who do graphic arts or art in general to make money, this will be a boon. Less time spent for more output. Learning to get the exact thing you're imaging from the AI output will be the new art class. That's not the end of the world, that's just the future.

    Also, nobody is forcing people to use this. If you do art, and you enjoy it, keep doing art. I do 3D art and I actually LOVE Midjourney because it's free concept art or inspiration for me to work from without

    • Re:

      And in that future, your clients will still be willing to pay you the same rate for generative art that they are paying you now? I'm not so sure about that.

    • Re:

      Will it? I've just tinkered with it a little bit, and my poor, design-challenged brain got somethings generated that are really snappy.

      The problem is, most design jobs don't need "great" - they need "good enough". And all that work just vanishes.

    • Re:

      Well hopefully you're right and this phase is largely transitory. After all, the industrial revolution did enable the masses to join the artisan class. Though it was also a bit of a mess for workers rights, political corruption, and corporate monopolization. Sure sounds familiar...

      However, there are some major concerns I still have in the long-term. Namely the potential for "outsourcing" and the gradual brain-drain of the creative industry. I can't help but look at what happened to the manufacturing industr

  • Re:

    we have been in that place forever. everything the media (any media) has been throwing at you during your half a century of life has been carefully calculated interest and bias, if not blunt propaganda.

    this ai revolution will only change how we go about it, these are new and different tools and will reshape the labor landscape and consumer habits, they will allow to expand the limits of art and media, they are already starting to produce hilarious upheaval in courts by ip trolls of every nature, but the per

  • Re:

    Deepfakes scar me because they are getting they the point they could cause Disasters geopolitical situations recently a disturbing example of one circulated on twitter https://twitter.com/raphouseme... [twitter.com] of a deepfake of Biden giving a speech invoking the draft. or the well known Zelensky deepfake. https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/16... [cnn.com]

    How long do we have until deepfakes are so indistinguishable for reality that bad actors could use them to cause a global catastrophe?

  • Re:

    Ted Kaczynski had the same thoughts, but in 1995.

  • Re:

    Hit your 50s have you? I've got a couple of decades on you whippersnapper. (I suppose people from your generation would say 'grasshopper' rather than 'whippersnapper' or is Kung Fu with David Carradine too old for you?) I've been worrying about the future since the 1950s when we were learning about fallout shelters in grade school.

    First of all, nobody knows the future. We could be headed for the mother of all disasters, or we may learn how to deal with this stuff. Partly it's a matter of luck, and I th

  • Re:

    Doomspeak. That is all I hear.
    But literally: "Now, anyone with access to software, can generate photographs of humans so convincing, they look real - even on second, third or fourth look." Good for this. Now everyone can be an artist. No longer is the art pool limited to just those with the time and money to become an "artist". Anybody can do it. Good. Awesome even, as now the choices we will have should explode. Where there were only one or two you might like there will now be thousands. This is Go


Recommend

About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK