

Kubernetes Gateway API reality check: Ingress controller is still needed
source link: https://venturebeat.com/programming-development/kubernetes-gateway-api-reality-check-ingress-controller-is-still-needed/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Kubernetes Gateway API reality check: Ingress controller is still needed

Check out the on-demand sessions from the Low-Code/No-Code Summit to learn how to successfully innovate and achieve efficiency by upskilling and scaling citizen developers. Watch now.
No doubt the new Kubernetes excitement is the Gateway API. One of the more significant changes in the Kubernetes project, the Gateway API is sorely needed. More granular and robust control over Kubernetes service networking better addresses the growing number of use cases and roles within the cloud-native paradigm.
Shared architecture — at all scales — requires flexible, scalable and extensible means to manage, observe and secure that infrastructure. The Gateway API is designed for those tasks. Once fully matured, it will help developers, SREs, platform teams, architects and CTOs by making Kubernetes infrastructure tooling and governance more modular and less bespoke.
But let’s be sure the hype does not get ahead of today’s needs.
The past and future Kubernetes gateway API
There remains a gap between present and future states of Ingress control in Kubernetes. This has led to a common misconception that the Gateway API will replace the Kubernetes Ingress Controller (KIC) in the near term or make it less useful over the longer term. This view is incorrect for multiple reasons.
Event
Intelligent Security Summit
Learn the critical role of AI & ML in cybersecurity and industry specific case studies on December 8. Register for your free pass today.
Ingress controllers are now embedded in the functional architecture of most Kubernetes deployments. They have become de facto. At some point, the Gateway API will be sufficiently mature to replace all functionality of the Ingress API and even the implementation-specific annotations and custom resources that many of the Ingress implementations use, but that day remains far off.
Today, most IT organizations are still either in the early adoption or the testing stage with Kubernetes. For many, just getting comfortable with the new architecture, networking constructs, and application and service management requirements requires considerable internal education and digestion.
Gateway API and Ingress controllers are not mutually exclusive
As we’ve done at NGINX, other Ingress maintainers will presumably implement the Gateway API in their products to take advantage of the new functionality and stay current with the Kubernetes API and project. Just as RESTful APIs are useful for many tasks, the Kubernetes API underpins many products and services, all built on the foundation of its powerful container orchestration engine.
The Gateway API is designed to be a universal component layer for managing service connectivity and behaviors within Kubernetes. It is expressive and extensible, making it useful for many roles, from DevOps to security to NetOps.
As a team that has invested considerable resources into an open source Ingress controller, NGINX could have chosen to integrate the Gateway API into our existing work. Instead, we elected to leverage the Gateway API as a standalone, more open-ended project. We chose this path so as not to project the existing constraints of our Ingress controller implementation onto ways we might hope to use the Gateway API or NGINX in the future. With fewer constraints, it is easier to fail faster or to explore new designs and concepts. Like most cloud-native technology, the Gateway API construct is designed for loose coupling and modularity — even more so than the Ingress controller, in fact.
We are also hopeful that some of our new work around the Gateway API is taken back into the open-source community. We have been present in the Kubernetes community for quite some time and are increasing our open-source efforts around the Gateway API.
It could be interpreted that the evolving API provides an invaluable insertion point and opportunity for a “do-over” on service networking. But that does not mean that everyone is quick to toss out years of investment in other projects. Ingress will continue to be important as Gateway API matures and develops, and the two are not mutually exclusive.
Plan for a hybrid future
Does it sound like we think the Kubernetes world should have its Gateway API cake and eat its Ingress controller too? Well, we do. Guilty as charged. Bottom line: We believe Kubernetes is a big tent with plenty of room for both new constructs and older categories. Improving on existing Ingress controllers —which were tethered to a limited annotation capability that induced complexity and reduced modularity — remains critical for organizations for the foreseeable future.
Yes, the Gateway API will help us improve Ingress controllers and unleash innovation, but it’s an API, not a product category. This new API is not a magic wand nor a silver bullet. Smart teams are planning for this hybrid future, learning about the improvements the Gateway API will bring while continuing to plan around ongoing Ingress controller improvement. The beauty of this hybrid reality is that everyone can run clusters in the way they know and desire. Every team gets what they want and need.
Brian Ehlert is director of product management at NGINX.
DataDecisionMakers
Welcome to the VentureBeat community!
DataDecisionMakers is where experts, including the technical people doing data work, can share data-related insights and innovation.
If you want to read about cutting-edge ideas and up-to-date information, best practices, and the future of data and data tech, join us at DataDecisionMakers.
You might even consider contributing an article of your own!
Recommend
-
173
Contour
-
121
ingress-nginx - Ingress controller for nginx
-
158
README.md GLBC
-
9
1 跨源资源共享CORS 跨源资源共享 (CORS) (或通俗地译为跨域资源共享)是一种基于HTTP
-
6
Kubernetes 中使用 API Gateway 替代 Ingress12 Sep 2017最近在构思基于 Kubernetes 建立一个个人的开放云平台 , 听起来有点不自量力 , 不过作为个人业余小玩意还是蛮好玩的。最终的成品希望是用户能够轻松地在平台上跑一些简单...
-
13
Emissary-ingress Emissary-Ingress is an open-source Kubernetes-native API Gateway + Layer 7 load balancer + Kubernetes Ingress built on Envoy Pr...
-
9
Custom health probes with Application Gateway Ingress Controller Published Wed, Feb 16, 2022 / by Thorsten Hans...
-
13
据我所知,这是kubernetes可用网关的最完整的列表。从技术上来讲,Ambassador不是ingress,但是它表现地已经非常好了。你可能已经看到了我制作的大表。 下面有个连接可以打开并清晰的看到一个excel表格,包含了图表的详细内容,如果发现不正确的地方,...
-
12
Monday, October 22, 2018 Understanding Istio Ingress Gateway in Kubernetes Traditionally, Kubernetes has used an Ingress controller to handle the traffic that enters the cluster f...
-
10
Kubernetes Gateway API如何战胜Ingress 作者:岱军 2024-01-30 07:58:41 尽管如此,Osborn说: "网关有一个独特的机会来统一南北流量和东西流量。网关组中有一个GAMMA 计划正致力于这一点 - 能够包含进出集群的所...
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK