9

Photo at 48 mega pixels Halide VS Stock camera 12 mega pixels | MacRumors Forums

 2 years ago
source link: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/photo-at-48-mega-pixels-halide-vs-stock-camera-12-mega-pixels.2364559/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

Photo at 48 mega pixels Halide VS Stock camera 12 mega pixels

ITsamsamsam

macrumors member

Original poster

I didn't find any direct comparisons on the net, so I figured I'd do it myself.

We know that iphone 14 pro shoots at 48 only in pro raw and we know that, in this case, the photo is much less processed than that at 12.
Finally, we know that the result of a photo at 12 is often more satisfying than one in pro raw because to make the pro raw equal or better than the Apple one, it is necessary to work (well) in post production.

My question: Halide allows you to shoot in 48 heic format ... is the resulting file "processed" or will it be rather "raw" like a proraw converted to jpeg?

The answer is that the 48 photos of halide heic are processed like the "stock" 1

12 mega pixels first

proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FYZdV3nv%2FIMG-5487.jpg&hash=161fc984d8c1135b02060d0231bb027a


proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FScnC6w0%2FIMG-5488.jpg&hash=f84cabc3bc3144c5dc9fe456797644a1


proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FvcPTYjC%2FSchermata-2022-10-09-alle-11-25-56.png&hash=06dcd3724a73d3f6822bf413c0cc25bb


proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FT8gwxMT%2FSchermata-2022-10-09-alle-11-27-32.png&hash=bc22cde9b5cf7c5f32a90d38945f9362



proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FccHLVWV%2FIMG-5495.jpg&hash=5871004abc8a8827745f7bb5abad1390


proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2Fy4dBLWC%2FIMG-5496.jpg&hash=ce466787e39294b705f7fb0660d2b462


proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FzQXQKJ7%2FSchermata-2022-10-09-alle-11-28-20.png&hash=c9c8c932d33c1e5bbae828fade9cedc5


proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FR9PvrBT%2FSchermata-2022-10-09-alle-11-29-43.png&hash=c15be394456772c091e8fc01f94cad00



proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FGn2XvhF%2FIMG-5512.jpg&hash=6e54ea678312f50695b1ad3c0f9035cb



What about Apple's pro raw?

Here is a comparison between two 48 mega heic photos taken with halide and two photos taken with the stock camera in pro raw and then edited with lightroom mobile:


proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2Fy4dBLWC%2FIMG-5496.jpg&hash=ce466787e39294b705f7fb0660d2b462


PS: Halide seems to consume less battery (it is true that I took two out of three photos with the stock camera, but the consumption seems to be of the photo app still seems to be higher in proportion)

what do you think?

</div


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK