
9

Photo at 48 mega pixels Halide VS Stock camera 12 mega pixels | MacRumors Forums
source link: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/photo-at-48-mega-pixels-halide-vs-stock-camera-12-mega-pixels.2364559/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Photo at 48 mega pixels Halide VS Stock camera 12 mega pixels
I didn't find any direct comparisons on the net, so I figured I'd do it myself.
We know that iphone 14 pro shoots at 48 only in pro raw and we know that, in this case, the photo is much less processed than that at 12.
Finally, we know that the result of a photo at 12 is often more satisfying than one in pro raw because to make the pro raw equal or better than the Apple one, it is necessary to work (well) in post production.
My question: Halide allows you to shoot in 48 heic format ... is the resulting file "processed" or will it be rather "raw" like a proraw converted to jpeg?
The answer is that the 48 photos of halide heic are processed like the "stock" 1
12 mega pixels first
What about Apple's pro raw?
Here is a comparison between two 48 mega heic photos taken with halide and two photos taken with the stock camera in pro raw and then edited with lightroom mobile:
PS: Halide seems to consume less battery (it is true that I took two out of three photos with the stock camera, but the consumption seems to be of the photo app still seems to be higher in proportion)
what do you think?
We know that iphone 14 pro shoots at 48 only in pro raw and we know that, in this case, the photo is much less processed than that at 12.
Finally, we know that the result of a photo at 12 is often more satisfying than one in pro raw because to make the pro raw equal or better than the Apple one, it is necessary to work (well) in post production.
My question: Halide allows you to shoot in 48 heic format ... is the resulting file "processed" or will it be rather "raw" like a proraw converted to jpeg?
The answer is that the 48 photos of halide heic are processed like the "stock" 1
12 mega pixels first
What about Apple's pro raw?
Here is a comparison between two 48 mega heic photos taken with halide and two photos taken with the stock camera in pro raw and then edited with lightroom mobile:
PS: Halide seems to consume less battery (it is true that I took two out of three photos with the stock camera, but the consumption seems to be of the photo app still seems to be higher in proportion)
what do you think?
</div
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK