7

Microspeak: The one-pager

 1 year ago
source link: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20220719-00/?p=106873
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Microspeak: The one-pager

RaymondChen_5in-150x150.jpg

Raymond Chen

July 19th, 20221

At Microsoft, a one-pager is an overview document. It is usually prepared during the early stages of a project or feature in order to share what is known, what is not known, and what the current ideas are. It is not intended to be a deep dive.

Different teams use different document templates for their one-pager documents. It might contain an elevator pitch, which is a brief statement of the problem and the desired outcome. In the business world, an elevator pitch is a brief but compelling description of an idea, product, or company, so-named because it is a speech you can give to someone important during the course of an elevator ride. In a one-pager, it is a brief but compelling description of your project or feature.

The other parts of the one-pager may be devoted to things like customer research results, a list of alternative solutions, the goals and non-goals of the feature, the project’s success metrics, and any external dependencies that would prevent the project from succeeding.

What I find particularly amusing is that the one-pager almost never fits on a single page. In many cases, the blank template is itself already longer than a page!

Some time ago, I was called upon to be one of several presenters, each of whom had a ten-minute time slot to present their one-pagers. I was the only one who managed to fit my one-pager onto a single page. It turns out that writing concisely takes work, and limiting yourself to one page forces you to make hard decisions about what is most important.

Bonus chatter: I think part of the reason for sprawling one-pagers is that people feel that they have to write more about a subject in order to prove that they have thought hard about it. They treat the document as a “proof of work” rather than as a means of concise communication. Another temptation is to anticipate all possible questions and pre-emptively answer them in the document. It’s true that your one-pager should call out rejected alternatives, but you don’t have to write a paragraph-long justification for rejecting each one. If you feel the need to provide “proof of work”, move it to a supplement or appendix.


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK