10

Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, ending the federal right to abortion

 1 year ago
source link: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-overturns-roe-wade-141521476.html?_tsrc=fin-notif
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Supreme Court votes to overturn Roe v. Wade, reversing federal right to abortion
3c7eb410-f3cb-11ec-b93e-6ea62d72cbaa
Scroll back up to restore default view.

Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, ending the federal right to abortion

Alexis Keenan
·Reporter
Fri, June 24, 2022, 11:15 PM·4 min read

The U.S. Supreme Court on Fridayoverturned its landmark decision Roe v. Wade that for nearly 50 years has secured the federal right to obtain an abortion — now roughly half of U.S. states will ban or curtail the procedure.

In a 6-3 decision, the court’s conservative majority struck down the 1973 case holding that states, rather than the federal government, are vested with authority to regulate abortion. As a result, states are free to restrict, and even outlaw, abortion. The case also struck down a 1992 case, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, that affirmed the right to obtain an abortion up until about 24 weeks of pregnancy.

Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority in the case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which upheld the state of Mississippi's abortion ban after 15 weeks of pregnancy and was signed by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Thomas and Kavanaugh filed concurring opinions, and Chief Justice John Roberts filed a concurring opinion.

"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one in which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely — the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment," Alito wrote.

Consigning women to 'second-class citizenship'

The court's liberal wing — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Stephen Breyer — filed a dissent asserting that the majority's opinion would lead to "the curtailment of women's rights, and their status as free and equal citizens."

That dissent contends that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause — which confers a right to privacy — should protect the right to an abortion even if that wasn't the founders' original intent.

"Those responsible for the original Constitution, including the Fourteenth Amendment, did not perceive women as equals, and did not recognize women's rights," the liberal justices wrote. "When the majority says that we must read our foundational charter as viewed at the time of ratification (except that we must also check it against the Dark Ages) it consigns women to second-class citizenship."


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK