i think everybody's camera firmware is different

wholelottared said:

My camera versions looks different than yours even though we're both Snapdragon and both on April update. Is this normal ? How it is different ?

Though Snapdragon, maybe based on model number(your unit is not SM-S908E/DS ?) Samsung provided different camera firmwares or used camera lenses from different OEMs(unlikely) and thus a different camera firmware! Have absolutely no idea.

With Watch 4 44mm, anyone using 20mm steel band from Spigen/Fullmosa/Samsung?

The first metal link of the band that is connected to the lug is flexible or stiff?

The 20mm one from Fullmosa is stiff at that joint, that link stays downwards and needs to apply some force to push upwards. Not necessary for me to push it up but would like to know "how is it" from other two makers?

nitinmits said:

I think everybody's camera firmware is different

That didn't used to be the case I think in previous models..

Yours is also different?

nitinmits said:

i think everybody's camera firmware is different

Virgo_Guy said:

Though Snapdragon, maybe based on model number(your unit is not SM-S908E/DS ?) Samsung provided different camera firmwares or used camera lenses from different OEMs(unlikely) and thus a different camera firmware! Have absolutely no idea.

I'm also using SM-908E/DS. I'm on April patch. The only difference is i'm from Turkey, not India. Still so weird that all the versions are different, someone needs to explain My camera always takes the photos with too much contrast in my opinion, like trees/leaves etc are too dark most of the times and shadows get crushed. And now the versions are different which makes me think what if my camera is a defect ? Idk.

akshay780 said:

i purchased s22 ultra from amazon.in without preorder ..still i can get galaxy watch 4 @2999?

anyone??

Virgo_Guy said:

With "AVCJ" build,
Camera app as well as OIS FW versions changed. Hope it translates into real life improvement.

Devices manufactured from march 8th/9th(try *#12580*369#) does carry a different camera module AM instead of SM from initial batches and to my surprise AM ones does have better edge sharpness and overall better image quality.....might be a better lens component

@Virgo_Guy is sony XF-1000XM4 good?

kannanX10 said:

Devices manufactured from march 8th/9th(try *#12580*369#) does carry a different camera module AM instead of SM from initial batches and

RF Cal from March middle in mine. So certain compoenents were calibrated later than the first batches..

kannanX10 said:

to my surprise AM ones does have better edge sharpness and overall better image quality....

This info is for real? Got some comparisons? If this is the case then it's a bad news for the early adopters.

kannanX10 said:

@Virgo_Guy is sony XF-1000XM4 good?

The world of reviewers said it's really good. Except that ear canals(discomfort) don't like it much AFAIK that reviewers "forgot" to mention. I personally haven't tested it buddy.

Virgo_Guy said:

RF Cal from March middle in mine. So certain compoenents were calibrated later than the first batches..

This info is for real? Got some comparisons? If this is the case then it's a bad news for the early adopters.

yes.......my first one made in February had speaker issue and to get that replaced i checked around 7 devices from February month ,all had(SM module )severe camera distortion around edges whereas 2 devices made in march with AM camera module had no issues in regards to edge distortion/blurring