3
Which display scaling setting do you use on your new 14" or 16" MacBoo...
source link: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/which-display-scaling-setting-do-you-use-on-your-new-14-or-16-macbook-pro.2321190/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Which display scaling do you use on your 14" or 16" 2021 MBP?
-
14" MBP > Larger Text (1)
Votes: 0
0.0%
-
14" MBP > Large (2)
Votes: 0
0.0%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total voters
Aug 10, 2012
UltimateSyn
macrumors demi-god
I go back and forth between 4 and 5 on my 14" MBP.
Reactions: marmiteturkey and Macusercom
I've been pretty content with the default scaling on the 14". I can comfortably have VS code open with 80 characters width and give a browser the near 2/3rds remaining screen.
UltimateSyn
macrumors demi-god
One anecdote:
I'm really happy about the increased PPI on the new MacBook Pros. On the older MBPs when I switched out of the default 2x mode it was noticeably blurry. I think the denser pixels on the new MBPs makes it so that even when I switch out of an integer (2x) scaling mode I really can't see a difference in clarity.
I'm really happy about the increased PPI on the new MacBook Pros. On the older MBPs when I switched out of the default 2x mode it was noticeably blurry. I think the denser pixels on the new MBPs makes it so that even when I switch out of an integer (2x) scaling mode I really can't see a difference in clarity.
fs454
macrumors 68000
I'd use the more space mode more often on the 14" but I think it makes the menubar look so ridiculous. Even coming from the 16" intel though I feel like I have plenty of real estate on the 14. I typically switch on demand when whatever I'm doing would benefit from smaller UI/more working space. Casual browsing I'm almost always on default.
Reactions: Macusercom
Aug 10, 2012
Same here. I now use 5 for using it as a laptop and 4 when docked to my 34" ultrawide as my MBP is so far away that small text becomes difficult to read. Gladly macOS remembers the scaling based on where you set it.I go back and forth between 4 and 5 on my 14" MBP.
Imho the menu bar on Monterey looks so huge. The spacing makes it that most menu bar icons disappear. Bartender works fine, but still. Decreasing the spacing with Bartender makes it look too small.I'd use the more space mode more often on the 14" but I think it makes the menubar look so ridiculous. Even coming from the 16" intel though I feel like I have plenty of real estate on the 14. I typically switch on demand when whatever I'm doing would benefit from smaller UI/more working space. Casual browsing I'm almost always on default.
waquzy
macrumors 65816
Default for me
ascender
macrumors 601
Dec 8, 2005
4,342
2,204
Same... on the 14" and 16".I go back and forth between 4 and 5 on my 14" MBP.
16" using Default with Tru Tone turned off for an accurate picture.
JamieLannister
macrumors 6502a
Jun 10, 2016
1,364
I did that musical chair BS with the 14" - got so sick of it trying to gain more real estate. I went for the 16" and at default it is just sublime.
Reactions: HappyInCalgary and TheRdungeon
16” with more space. Standard is far too large and wasteful.
Default is sharp but unfortunately is difficult for my eyes for long duration usage
Reactions: CoastalOR and Cape Dave
Fonts are way too tiny with that! I actually will run 16" with larger fonts (#3) relative to default (#4) sometimes on my 16" intel just to make it easier on my eyes, though default is OK. (glasses work better for me than contacts).16” with more space. Standard is far too large and wasteful.
I can read the fonts with #5 fairly clearly but I just find them to not be as comfortable.
Reactions: Cape Dave
vincenz
macrumors 601
Oct 20, 2008
4,282
#5
Glad my eyes can still handle it.
Glad my eyes can still handle it.
You can make fonts bigger if you need to. This is always going to vary by app/user.Fonts are way too tiny with that! I actually will run 16" with larger fonts (#3) relative to default (#4) sometimes on my 16" intel just to make it easier on my eyes, though default is OK. (glasses work better for me than contacts).
I can read the fonts with #5 fairly clearly but I just find them to not be as comfortable.
Changing font size without the main resolution always ends up with really weird UI/buttons/etc though. Not worth it.You can make fonts bigger if you need to. This is always going to vary by app/user.
I only change the font size in Safari. No issues for years this way.Changing font size without the main resolution always ends up with really weird UI/buttons/etc though. Not worth it.
jungleghost
macrumors member
Apr 5, 2021
Yeah, I'm using my 13" M1 at 1920x1200, which gives me much more space, but in safari I change the zoom to 115%, works great.I only change the font size in Safari. No issues for years this way.
Reactions: WilliamG
hey ,how can you do that please ?You can make fonts bigger if you need to. This is always going to vary by app/user.
16", default res, but with contact lenses it can be a bit blurry/small for me. With glasses on my vision is a little sharper and works well.
I use Command + or Command - and Safari remembers on a per-site basis.hey ,how can you do that please ?
yes but then u have to do it on every little site you open ,quite annoying.I use Command + or Command - and Safari remembers on a per-site basis.
I mean how do u do system wise ,for any app but a browser ?
I don’t have that issue. Don’t think you can.yes but then u have to do it on every little site you open ,quite annoying.
I mean how do u do system wise ,for any app but a browser ?
Christopher Kim
macrumors 6502a
Nov 18, 2016
On my 14", I'm using 1 notch "bigger text" (#3) than default when using it in bed on my lap, and on default #4 when using on a desk. I found that when on lap in bed, because the screen is further away from my eyes, text felt a tad bit too small. Going up a notch was perfect - even though I lose "True pixel-doubling" HiDPI, I can't tell any difference in smoothness or image quality by being slightly off perfect pixel-doubled.
Maybe my eyes aren't what they used to be, but still only in my late-30s!
Maybe my eyes aren't what they used to be, but still only in my late-30s!
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK