

Austrian DPA Ruling against Google Analytics Paves the Way to EU-based Cloud Ser...
source link: https://www.infoq.com/news/2022/01/austrian-privacy-gdpr-google/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Austrian DPA Ruling against Google Analytics Paves the Way to EU-based Cloud Services
Jan 27, 2022 2 min read
In a recent ruling, the Austrian data regulator declared the use of Google Analytics unlawful based on EU GDPR regulation. While the ruling is very specifically argued and worded, its implications go well beyond this particular case.
At the heart of the Austrian data regulator ruling, which hinges on a 2020 ruling by the European Court of Justice, is the argument that the transmission of personal data to the US breaks the requirement of their adequate protection due to US surveillance laws.
The Second Respondent [Google], as providers [of] electronic Communications services within the meaning of 50 US Code §1881 and, as such, is subject to surveillance by US intelligence agencies pursuant to 50 US Code §1881a (“FISA 702”).
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) establishes that any non-US person located abroad can be the target of surveillance activities, and this without special requirements like being a suspect terrorist, spy, or agent of a foreign power. FISA also regulates how US government agencies such as the NSA, FBI, or CIA can require and get access to transferred data directly from service providers, e.g. Apple or Google.
This is not the whole story, though. In fact, the Austrian regulator also considers that additional measures taken to protect the data, such as data encryption at rest in Google's datacenters, are not effective since they do not eliminate the monitoring and access possibilities by US intelligence services.
This is a very tough strike against the usual approach that major US-based companies take to enforce the idea they reasonably protect the data they receive from their customers. What the Austrian DPA comes to say is that EU data travelling to the US do not receive adequate protection regardless of what service providers may attempt to do.
While the Austrian DPA ruling is of application exclusively within Austrian borders, nevertheless it finds its grounding in the aforementioned ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ), which substantially knocks down the idea of an adequate "Privacy Shield" existing between the EU and the US. This leads to think that the Austrian ruling could be easily mirrored in other EU countries.
It is not clear at the moment how US-based Cloud service providers could change the way they handle their EU-based customers' data in a way that is compliant with the GDPR, and it is surely appropriate to wait for their attempt to comply with the GDPR. Yet, it may be reasonable for EU-based companies which have mostly an EU-based audience to start thinking of alternatives granting higher privacy standards.
This may include services and tools hosted and/or developed in the EU by European companies. On the front of analytics services, for example, some alternatives to Google Analytics are Fathom, Plausible, SplitBee, and others. The list of alternative services and tools developed in the EU is much longer, though, and encompasses a number of categories, including SaaS, monitoring, VPNs, CDNs, and more.
Albeit not yet final, the Austrian DPA ruling can be seen as only the most recent step in a confrontation that has been going on for at least 15 years, and saw first the dismissal of the "Safe Harbor" doctrine, then of the "Privacy Shield".
About the Author
Sergio De Simone
Sergio De Simone is a software engineer. Sergio has been working as a software engineer for over fifteen years across a range of different projects and companies, including such different work environments as Siemens, HP, and small startups. For the last few years, his focus has been on development for mobile platforms and related technologies. He is currently working for BigML, Inc., where he leads iOS and OS X development.
Show moreRecommend
-
22
EHang gets long-term Austrian permit to test passenger drone ...
-
12
Blog Post Case Study: How the Austrian Government Uses PSPDFKit to Bring Digital Signatures to Everyone
-
8
README.md OGD.AT Lab This lab...
-
8
Why Every Entrepreneur Should Study the Austrian School of Economics Modern economics is a theory of the economy that leaves no place for the entrepreneur. So where should entrepreneurs turn to improve their und...
-
11
Austrian DSB: Use of Google Analytics violates "Schrems II" decision by CJEU. In a groundbreaking decision, the Austrian Data Protection Authority ("Datenschutzbehörde" or "DSB") has decided on a model case...
-
9
Two-minute reviewAustrian Audio isn’t a well-known name here in the UK, having only been founded in Vienna in 2017. The company has mostly made its name in the more serious hi-fi market since then, providing high-quality headphones f...
-
8
EU upholds antitrust ruling against Google’s actions on Android, drops fine to €4.1 billion September 1...
-
10
Nils Vieth September 18, 2022 4 minute read ...
-
2
India2 minute readJanuary 19, 202311:00 PM UTCLast Updated 3 days agoIndian startups rejoice as Android ruling against Google upheld
-
6
A hacker tried to sell the personal information of nearly every Austrian citizen, police say A case of human error with major consequences By
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK