Whose Open Source Freedom is it Anyway?
source link: https://dirkriehle.com/2021/07/10/whose-open-source-freedom-is-it-anyway/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Whose Open Source Freedom is it Anyway?
It is 2021 and there is still a lot of fighting about “freedom” in open source software development. Here is an analytical breakdown of the issues.
Freedom can refer to people or artifacts (source code). When it refers to people, it is typically freedom of choice regarding what to do. There are three main roles in open source: The original programmer, an intermediary (another programmer or a software vendor), and the users or customers of the vendor. I’m simplifying, but this matches the distribution use-case in which license clauses put the most obligations on people.
When freedom refers to artifacts, it is usually a license that forces behavior of the people wanting to use the artifacts. Whether freedom is something that can be attached to anything else but humans, I’ll leave to philosophers to discuss.
An open source programmer defines the license for their work. If the programmer chooses a permissive license, they give the recipient of their code, e.g. a vendor, freedom of choice on how to pass on the code. If the programmer chooses a copyleft license, they force the vendor to pass on their work to customers using the same copyleft license. This creates freedom for the customer who in the situation that the vendor does not provide the source code can possibly help themselves in the case of bugs.
So, freedom of choice refers either to the vendor (permissive license) or their customers (copyleft license). Denigrating programmers and vendors who use permissive licenses as anti-freedom, because they want to keep their own freedom, seems unfair to me.
In reality, of course, vendors have long banned using copyleft licenses in their products. The whole fighting one can observe comes from either clueless vendors who did not know what they were getting into or historical circumstances like the Linux kernel being both unavoidable and mostly copyleft-licensed.
The open source software industry is vendor-dominated, and so it is no surprise that most new open source software is permissively licensed.
List of most commonly used open source licenses 2009-2019 according to Synopsys
This may change, if users take a more active role and will try to reign in the profits of the software industry, but that is still far into the future.
Like this:
Recommend
-
40
SiFive is the first fabless semiconductor company to build customized silicon based on the free and open RISC-V instruction set architecture.
-
53
GKE usage metering: Whose line item is it anywa...
-
58
Introduction What are the performance differences between Next.js and Create React App? Let’s unpack that question with some data, but first, we need to understand what exactly we are comparing here. ...
-
13
Social media firms whose sites are accessed by under 13s will face multimillion pound fines Age assurance or verification technology required by Ofcom to bar under-aged children from accessing 'inappropriate' content on social med...
-
11
Open sourcing fred in the name of freedom Over the past couple of days, I've asked for direction from my readers. I wanted to know what I should work on next. The response was clear: do f...
-
3
Improving Code Ownership at Yelp In this prior blog post, Kent talked about how the Engineering Effecti...
-
8
Whose nine is it anyway? (Feedback on the WCAG 2.2 working draft) Ben Tillyer | June 11, 2021 | Development On 31s...
-
4
Whose job is it anyway? The rise of Product Ops and why it deserves to be an independent function ...
-
4
Whose Cert Is It Anyway? May 14th, 2023 This is the third blog post on the topic of the centralization of the internet. The first post, discussing diversity of authoritative name servers, can...
-
5
Internet freedom with the Open Technology Fund By Spencer Michaels, William Woodruff, Jeff Braswell, and Cliff Smith Trail of Bits cares about internet freedom, and one of our most value...
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK