5
Apple Releases New '3E756' AirPods Max Firmware
source link: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/apple-releases-new-3e756-airpods-max-firmware.2299914/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Apple Releases New '3E756' AirPods Max Firmware
Apr 12, 2001
52,893
14,611
Apple today released new 3E756 firmware designed for the AirPods Max, marking the third firmware update Apple has introduced for its high-end headphones since their December launch.
The new 3E756 firmware replaces the 3C39 firmware that was released to AirPods Max owners in March.
Apple does not provide details on what's included in new firmware updates, so we don't know what bug fixes or improvements the new firmware might offer. There may be improvements to battery life, or updated support for Spatial Audio, a feature that debuted for Apple Music yesterday.
There's no standard way to upgrade firmware on AirPods, AirPods Pro, or AirPods Max, but connecting the AirPods Max to an iPhone or an iPad while connected to a power source may force the update.
You can check the firmware on your AirPods Max by following these steps:
If we find notable changes after installing the firmware updates, we'll update this article.
Article Link: Apple Releases New '3E756' AirPods Max Firmware
Apple does not provide details on what's included in new firmware updates, so we don't know what bug fixes or improvements the new firmware might offer. There may be improvements to battery life, or updated support for Spatial Audio, a feature that debuted for Apple Music yesterday.
There's no standard way to upgrade firmware on AirPods, AirPods Pro, or AirPods Max, but connecting the AirPods Max to an iPhone or an iPad while connected to a power source may force the update.
You can check the firmware on your AirPods Max by following these steps:
- Connect your AirPods Max to your iOS device.
- Open the Settings app.
- Tap General.
- Tap About.
- Tap AirPods.
- Look at the number next to "Firmware Version."
If we find notable changes after installing the firmware updates, we'll update this article.
Article Link: Apple Releases New '3E756' AirPods Max Firmware
Last edited: Yesterday at 12:41 PM
Reactions: dazzlingirl
anshuvorty
macrumors 68000
Sep 1, 2010 1,804 1,712
I am sure, nay, almost certain, this is to fix and tamper down the criticism that these headphones can't play lossless audio files...
Mithulan2019
macrumors newbie
Sep 14, 2019
Do you guys see spatial audio animation while playing Dolby Atmos track ? I can see only while playing videos.
sw1tcher
macrumors 68020
Jan 6, 2004
2,180
3,870
Definitely doesn't give them support for lossless audioApple does not provide details on what's included in new firmware updates, so we don't know what bug fixes or improvements the new firmware might offer.
Reactions: applesque and G5isAlive
turbineseaplane
macrumors 604
Mar 19, 2008
7,201
11,069
Umm, no, it doesn'tNo it's not. It happens with all Over-The-Ear headphones.
I've never had anything like it - with dozens of pairs over decades
joecomo
macrumors 6502
Jul 10, 2010
I was hoping for a 2nd improved edition of this product to replace my SONY WH-1000xm3,
but I fear the AirPod Max will follow the original HomePod into obsolescense
but I fear the AirPod Max will follow the original HomePod into obsolescense
tripleh3lix
macrumors 6502
Jun 17, 2014
It just came out 6 months ago.I was hoping for a 2nd improved edition of this product to replace my SONY WH-1000xm3,
but I fear the AirPod Max will follow the original HomePod into obsolescense
odHbo
macrumors regular
Jun 5, 2007
Btw, Spacial Audio sounds amazing on APM. I particularly love The Weeknd - “Blinding Lights”.I never have condensation in my APM. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
joecomo
macrumors 6502
Jul 10, 2010
MrMacintoshIII
macrumors 6502
Oct 11, 2019
What this update needs to do is absolutely fix the weird connectivity and audio clicking interruptions that don’t ****ing go away until you go back to main iPhone audio and then back to Max. Sometimes takes a few tries.
Verryyyy dumb. I’ll report back to see if this has fixed the awful connectivity issues that crop up 50% of the time.
Good thing I bought AppleCare. I’m close to starting a support chat and letting them know this is simply unacceptable and will be needing a replacement if this firmware doesn’t address the issue.
Verryyyy dumb. I’ll report back to see if this has fixed the awful connectivity issues that crop up 50% of the time.
Good thing I bought AppleCare. I’m close to starting a support chat and letting them know this is simply unacceptable and will be needing a replacement if this firmware doesn’t address the issue.
furqan8421
macrumors regular
Jun 27, 2007
To this day don't understand why apple handles the AirPods software updates the way they have
You can't choose to update or not, there's never any real change log. I'm typically an early updater anyways so it doesn't matter as much for me, but I can't think of a good reason. It's not like they are letting out trade secrets in the update logs
You can't choose to update or not, there's never any real change log. I'm typically an early updater anyways so it doesn't matter as much for me, but I can't think of a good reason. It's not like they are letting out trade secrets in the update logs
And what do you want fixed? The only 2 problems I’ve heard about on here: condensation and 1 side temporarily losing transparency mode (or something like that) seem rare. I’ve not experienced either.I was hoping for a 2nd improved edition of this product to replace my SONY WH-1000xm3,
but I fear the AirPod Max will follow the original HomePod into obsolescense
And if you’re waiting for an on/off button, I think you should reconsider. I’m not saying I would be upset if they added one, but it’s really a non-issue, and I’m not sure they’ll ever “give in” on that.
The only real problem is cost, which will get better with time.
furqan8421
macrumors regular
Jun 27, 2007
I own a pair but I could see them being a 1 of 1. Obviously can go either way but the high end headphone market is probably fairly niche as it is. I own a pair and am fine with them, but there's a lot of competition for a small segment of the market overall.It just came out 6 months ago.
Time will tell ultimately
Aiii83
macrumors newbie
May 13, 2021
Now when you put them on, instead of the familiar connection dong, Siri will sternly remind users that bluetooth is by nature a lossy transmission method.I am sure, nay, almost certain, this is to fix and tamper down the criticism that these headphones can't play lossless audio files...
furqan8421
macrumors regular
Jun 27, 2007
I disagree about the thing being a non issue. With my own pair I ran into that bug which some people reported leading to excessive battery drain. I use them infrequently enough to where it didn't matter much, but more than once would fully charge and have a depleted battery a day later.And what do you want fixed? The only 2 problems I’ve heard about on here: condensation and 1 side temporarily losing transparency mode (or something like that) seem rare. I’ve not experienced either.
And if you’re waiting for an on/off button, I think you should reconsider. I’m not saying I would be upset if they added one, but it’s really a non-issue, and I’m not sure they’ll ever “give in” on that.
The only real problem is cost, which will get better with time.
Doesn't affect everyone but this would have been fixed by an on off mechanism of some sort, even through software
I think they are great headphones and are a pleasure to wear when I want to focus. Far better than my H95’s in terms of control and fit.
Yes there are some connections issues when switching to the phone from iPad for example , but am sure these will get resolved.
Yes there are some connections issues when switching to the phone from iPad for example , but am sure these will get resolved.
Reactions: henrikhelmers and ignatius345
jprmercado
macrumors regular
Jun 12, 2012
Apparently, mine shipped with 3C39. [Bought my Max near the end of last month.] No issues so far, so I wonder what improvements come with 3E756.
Like some of you mentioned, I wish we had more control over initiating firmware updates and more visibility on the changes applied per update.
Like some of you mentioned, I wish we had more control over initiating firmware updates and more visibility on the changes applied per update.
Reactions: one more, amartinez1660 and wwinter86
sdornan
macrumors member
Apr 21, 2010
Ugh, getting Apple to push me the new firmware is always an exercise in frustration.
Reactions: one more
ApfelKuchen
macrumors 601
Aug 28, 2012 4,005 2,548 Between the coasts
Seems easy enough to understand: They have software improvements that they want to push out to all users, not just those who notice an update is available and then take the time to install it. If it can be handled on a fully-automated basis, then why add the human element to the equation? I find this nearly seductive - a product that automatically improves over time.To this day don't understand why apple handles the AirPods software updates the way they have
You can't choose to update or not, there's never any real change log. I'm typically an early updater anyways so it doesn't matter as much for me, but I can't think of a good reason. It's not like they are letting out trade secrets in the update logs
Why shouldn’t firmware auto-update? It’s relatively simple device-specific software. Updates will be either bug fixes, power-efficiency tweaks, more-efficient/higher-quality codec algorithms, improved wireless communication profiles, or add compatibility with features delivered by new versions of the serving device’s OS. Is there something on this list a person wouldn’t want?
Unlike a desktop computing environment there’s no need to stay on an older OS in order to support apps that are incompatible with the new OS, there’s nearly never a change to operating control functions (adapt to new/modified UI elements)…
Change logs… this isn’t an open system OS where users are actively engaged in debugging. If you mean the typical Apple-style update notice, “Fixed an issue that could impact connectivity to devices using certain Bluetooth chip sets” Just how many users would find that at all helpful?
Altogether, on what basis would any individual choose to not upgrade? Would it be a properly informed decision, or just an emotional response to change of any sort? Bottom line for me is, if you distrust the company’s ability to improve the product through software, or distrust the company’s motives for issuing new software, then why buy the product in the first place?
Reactions: SFjohn, JJL2026 and G5isAlive
dude-x
macrumors regular
Mar 2, 2007
It can't support lossless audio unless Apple invents a new radio standard. Sony's LDAC is ALMOST cd quality. Or Apple places a stronger transmitter to allow WiFi bandwidth for audio. Or Apple places memory chips in the headset to buffer a stream.Definitely doesn't give them support for lossless audio
Reactions: jhollington and applesque
freedomlinux
macrumors member
Jul 27, 2008
Why shouldn’t firmware auto-update? It’s relatively simple device-specific software. Updates will be either bug fixes, power-efficiency tweaks, more-efficient/higher-quality codec algorithms, improved wireless communication profiles, or add compatibility with features delivered by new versions of the serving device’s OS. Is there something on this list a person wouldn’t want?
Like that time when an AirPods Pro firmware update (2B588) had issues with noise cancelling?Altogether, on what basis would any individual choose to not upgrade? Would it be a properly informed decision, or just an emotional response to change of any sort?
Apple Provides Advice to AirPods Pro Users Experiencing Noise Cancellation or Crackling Sound Issues
Reactions: jhollington and amartinez1660
BWhaler
macrumors 68040
Jan 8, 2003
3,271
4,508
I disagree with the reason you disagree. you don't fix a problem (battery draining) that some, but definitely not all, have but slapping on another button. You fix the problem at the sofware root. I believe the problem is real, and maybe it has already been fixed, or maybe its in the next fix, but I have faith it will be fixed for those that have the problem (I personally do not). I have come to really really really appreciate that to use the headphones I just have to pick them up off the desk and put them on my head. Certainly a first world luxury to not have to worry if they are on or off, or take the time to flick a switch, but it is a luxury I enjoy. Do not want it taken away to fix a problem I do not have.I disagree about the thing being a non issue. With my own pair I ran into that bug which some people reported leading to excessive battery drain. I use them infrequently enough to where it didn't matter much, but more than once would fully charge and have a depleted battery a day later.
Doesn't affect everyone but this would have been fixed by an on off mechanism of some sort, even through software
Reactions: jhollington and amartinez1660
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK