Github Fix suggestions for missing return type lifetime specifiers by FabianWolf...

This pull request aims to fix #84592. The issue is that the current code seems to assume that there is only a single relevant span pointing to the missing lifetime, and only looks at the first one:

This is incorrect, though, and leads to incorrect error messages and invalid suggestions. For instance, the example from #84592:

struct TwoLifetimes<'x, 'y> {
    x: &'x (),
    y: &'y (),
}

fn two_lifetimes_needed(a: &(), b: &()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_, '_> {
    TwoLifetimes { x: &(), y: &() }
}

currently leads to:

error[E0106]: missing lifetime specifiers
 --> src/main.rs:6:57
  |
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed(a: &(), b: &()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_, '_> {
  |                            ---     ---                  ^^ expected 2 lifetime parameters
  |
  = help: this function's return type contains a borrowed value, but the signature does not say whether it is borrowed from `a` or `b`
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
  |
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed<'a>(a: &'a (), b: &'a ()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_<'a, 'a>, '_> {
  |                        ^^^^    ^^^^^^     ^^^^^^                  ^^^^^^^^^^

There are two problems:

• The error message is wrong. There is only one lifetime parameter expected at the location pointed to by the error message (and another one at a separate location).
• The suggestion is incorrect and will not lead to correct code.

With the changes in this PR, I get the following output:

error[E0106]: missing lifetime specifiers
 --> p.rs:6:57
  |
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed(a: &(), b: &()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_, '_> {
  |                            ---     ---                  ^^  ^^ expected named lifetime parameter
  |                                                         |
  |                                                         expected named lifetime parameter
  |
  = help: this function's return type contains a borrowed value, but the signature does not say whether it is borrowed from `a` or `b`
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
  |
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed<'a>(a: &'a (), b: &'a ()) -> TwoLifetimes<'a, 'a> {
  |                        ^^^^    ^^^^^^     ^^^^^^                  ^^  ^^

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0106`.

Mainly, I changed add_missing_lifetime_specifiers_label() to receive a vector of spans (and counts) instead of just one, and adjusted its body accordingly.