Pondering Products of Place-Level Distances: A Reply to Reinhart
source link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10940-016-9300-2
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Baumer E, Gustafson R (2007) Social organization and instrumental crime: assessing the empirical validity of classic and contemporary anomie theories. Criminology 45(3):617–663
Fox J (2016) Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Sage, New York
Hanushek E, Jackson J (1977) Statistical methods for social scientists. Elsevier, New York
Reinhart A (2016) Response to “crime places in context.” J Quant Criminol. doi:10.1007/s10940-016-9299-4
Author information
Affiliations
Department of Criminology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida—Sarasota Manatee, 8350 N. Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, FL, 34243, USA
Rustu Deryol
School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
John Wooldredge & Pamela Wilcox
Department of Criminal Justice, California State University—San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, USA
Matthew Logan
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Rustu Deryol.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deryol, R., Wooldredge, J., Wilcox, P. et al. Pondering Products of Place-Level Distances: A Reply to Reinhart. J Quant Criminol 32, 725–735 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9300-2
Published14 May 2016
Issue DateDecember 2016
Keywords
- Crime and place
- Environmental criminology
- Discordance
- 3-way product term
- 3-way interaction
- Deviance statistics
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK