5

Snapdragon 632 vs A14 Bionic

 3 years ago
source link: https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-632-vs-apple-a14-bionic
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 632 vs A14 Bionic – what's better?

Snapdragon 632 vs A14 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (Adreno 506) with the newer 6-core Apple A14 Bionic (Apple GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of Apple A14 Bionic
  • Supports 472% higher memory bandwidth (42.7 against 7.46 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 5x) AnTuTu 8 score – 596K vs 119K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 14 nm)
  • 66% higher CPU clock speed (2990 vs 1800 MHz)
  • Announced 2-years and 3-months later
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 8

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 60244 173864 GPU 10499 208037 Memory 27587 106696 UX 11175 93575 Total score 119977 596904

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression 81 Mpixels/s 174.85 Mpixels/s Face detection 11.3 images/s 33.7 images/s Speech recognition 18.95 words/s 95.65 words/s Machine learning 13.05 images/s 95.8 images/s Camera shooting 8.73 images/s 38.45 images/s HTML 5 1.05 Mnodes/s 4.59 Mnodes/s SQLite 426.3 Krows/s 1.1 Krows/s

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 632 and A14 Bionic
Architecture 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Gold (Cortex-A73
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Silver (Cortex-A53) 2x 2.99 GHz – Firestorm
4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm Cores 8 6 Frequency 1800 MHz 2990 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.4-A L1 cache 128 KB - L3 cache - 8 MB Process 14 nanometers 5 nanometers Transistor count 2 billion 11.8 billion TDP 7 W 6 W

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 506 Apple GPU Architecture Adreno 500 - GPU frequency 725 MHz - Execution units 1 4 Shading units 96 - FLOPS 124.8 Gigaflops - Vulkan version 1.0 - OpenCL version 2.0 - DirectX version 12 -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR3 LPDDR5 Memory frequency 933 MHz - Bus 1x 32 Bit - Max bandwidth 7.46 Gbit/s 42.7 Gbit/s Max size 6 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 546 Neural Engine Storage type eMMC 5.1 NVMe Max display resolution 1920 x 1200 2732 x 2048 Max camera resolution 1x 40MP, 2x 13MP - Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9, Motion JPEG Audio codecs 192 кГц/24-бит, Dolby 5.1 AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+

Connectivity

Modem X9 LTE - 4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 18 5G support No Yes Download speed Up to 300 Mbps - Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps - Wi-Fi 5 6 Bluetooth 5.0 5.0 Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Announced June 2018 September 2020 Class Mid range Flagship Model number SDM632 APL1W01 Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
Snapdragon 632
1 (33.3%)
A14 Bionic
2 (66.7%)
Total votes: 3

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A14 Bionic and Snapdragon 632, or ask any questions
Name
Message

report

Recommend

About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK