

Huawei HKSP Introduces Trivially Exploitable Vulnerability in the Linux Kernel
source link: https://grsecurity.net/huawei_hksp_introduces_trivially_exploitable_vulnerability
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Huawei has seemingly stepped its foot into the kernel-self protection game with the release of HKSP . The patch itself is riddled with bugs and weaknesses and generally lacks any kind of threat model (making its mitigations similar to those present in LKRG where knowledge of the mitigation in place is enough to bypass it). It is not clear if the posted patchset is an official Huawei release or whether this code is already shipping on any Huawei devices, but the patchset uses Huawei in its name, and the Github account for the patchset lists Huawei as the organization for the account.
Our focus today in this short blog post will be how the HKSP patchset introduced a trivially exploitable vulnerability due to a complete lack of defensive programming.
In the patch, a /proc/ksguard/state entry is created. Giving a hint to the level of review of the code, every time this entry is opened or closed, the following lines referencing a nonexistent filename are output to dmesg:
open /proc/ksg_state_proc ok.
close /proc/ksg_state_proc ok.
As we can see in the below line of the patch, the state
entry is created with global RWX rights, a sign of carelessness given that the entry doesn't support any meaningful read operation and execute is meaningless on such an entry.
state_proc = proc_create("state", 0777, ksg_proc, &ksg_state_ops);
The ksg_state_write
handler for writes to this entry looks like this:
static ssize_t ksg_state_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *offset) { u64 value; char tmp[32]; size_t n = 0; if (copy_from_user(tmp, buf, len)) return -1; value = simple_strtoul(tmp, '\0', 10); switch (value) { case 1: ksg_check_keyboard(); break; case 2: ksg_check_nf(); break; case 3: ksg_check_pointer(); break; case 4: ksg_check_sct(); break; default: break; } *offset += len; n += len; return len; }
There are a number of issues with this function. First, there is the return -1
which should return a proper errno (generally -EFAULT
). There is an n
variable that is assigned to, but not used for anything. There are no checks at all on the value of len
. The first issue this causes is acting as a limited oracle. By writing 0 bytes to the entry, the uninitialized tmp
array will attempt to have a number parsed out of it and then acted upon. Likewise, writing a full 32 bytes to the entry and failing to NUL-terminate the string will cause simple_strtoul to access out of bounds, potentially operating as a partial oracle for adjacent memory. Most importantly, due to the lack of checks on len
, and given that tmp
is a simple 32-byte stack array, this introduces a trivially exploitable kernel stack buffer overflow able to be performed by any unprivileged user.
For completeness, a simple PoC is provided below:
#include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <fcntl.h> int main(void) { char buf[4096] = { }; int fd = open("/proc/ksguard/state", O_WRONLY); if (fd >= 0) { write(fd, buf, sizeof(buf)); close(fd); } return 0; }
Effective security defenses require defined, realistic threat models. Defenses in the kernel should be programmed defensively and with reducing maintenance burdens in mind. The kernel can effectively be thought of as the largest, most vulnerable setuid root binary on the system. New code added to this most-privileged component of the system is potential new attack surface and requires heavy scrutiny, lest worse problems be introduced than were attempted to be solved in the first place.
Recommend
-
52
On the week of July 15th researcher Juha-Matti Tilli disclosed a vulnerability he discovered in the Linux kernel to the kernel maintainers, the National Cyber Security Center – Finland (NCSC-FI),
-
52
Security researchers have discovered a new remotely exploitable vulnerability in Oracle Weblogic Server (WLS). The vulnerability, assigned
-
6
New issue Properly handle Self type for trivially_copy_pass_by_ref #7535
-
6
A remotely exploitable OpenSSL/LibreSSL vulnerability [Posted March 15, 2022 by corbet] The OpenSSL project has disclosed a vulnerability where...
-
3
Contributor ...
-
5
Some remotely exploitable kernel WiFi vulnerabilities [Posted October 13, 2022 by corbet] It would appear that there is
-
6
Should the compiler sometimes reject a [[trivially_relocatable]] warrant? ...
-
9
Polymorphic types aren’t trivially relocatable
-
8
Should assignment affect is_trivially_relocatable?
-
6
A locally exploitable glibc vulnerability [Posted January 31, 2024 by corbet] Qualys has
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK