28

Testing React Checkbox Component

 4 years ago
source link: https://github.com/tamouse/swaac/blob/master/posts/2019-08-29-testing-react-checkbox-component.org
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Testing React Checkbox Component

published date: [2019-08-29 Thu]

keywords: react, testing, checkbox, querySelector, rerender, queryByTestId, testing-library

Recently, I built a partial form section that included a couple of checkboxes, and I wanted to verify their operation with a unit test.

I’m using testing-library , including the react-specific methods. I’m finding this a godsend in making tests easier to write and understand.

Testing and debugging react components is still fraught with uncertainty for me, I’m still learning and fumbling my way around. Hooks have made writing components much easier, without a doubt, yet there are still times I just don’t know what’s happening.

In this particular episode, your intrepid frontend dev (me) had to find out three things about the form segment:

  1. a lookup (autosuggest) field was completely hidden until a partcular checkbox was set.
  2. another checkbox was disabled until another field had data in it.
  3. a specific row of the form would appear only when another value was true.

For our purposes here, only 1 and 2 are of interest.

Displaying a field form when a checkbox is setfield

For this form row, the code under test looks like this:

const ServiceLocation = ({ name, value, initialValue, onSelectParent }) => {
  const [serviceArea, setServiceArea] = useState(!!value)
  const toggleCheckbox = () => {
    setServiceArea(!serviceArea)
  }
  return (
    <FormField name={name}>
      <FormFieldSubRow>
        <Checkbox
          value={serviceArea}
          onChange={toggleCheckbox}
          data-testid="service-area-checkbox"
        >
          {" "}
          {I18n.t("service_location.label", { scope: i18nScope })}
        </Checkbox>{" "}
        {serviceArea ? (
          <CustomerLookupWrapper data-testid="customer-lookup-wrapper">
            <CustomerLookup
              name={name}
              initialValue={initialValue}
              placeholder="Parent"
              onSelect={onSelectParent}
            />
          </CustomerLookupWrapper>
        ) : null}
      </FormFieldSubRow>
    </FormField>
  )
}

Placing the data-testid “service-area-checkbox” on the Checkbox component gives the test a way of finding the DOM element it needs to work with. The “customer-lookup-wrapper” `data-testid` will be used to determine if the second element shows up when the that checkbox is clicked.

The spec for this looks like:

it("displays the parent lookup field when the service location checkbox becomes checked", async () => {
  const LOOKUP_WRAPPER_TESTID = "customer-lookup-wrapper"
  const props = {
    fields: {},
    parent: {},
    handleChange: jest.fn(),
    onDuplicateCustomerName: jest.fn(),
    onSelectParent: jest.fn()
  }

  const { queryByTestId, getByTestId, rerender } = render(
    <Providers>
      <CustomerInfoFormSection {...props} />
    </Providers>
  )

  const serviceAreaCheckbox = getByTestId("service-area-checkbox")
  const checkBoxActual = serviceAreaCheckbox.querySelector(
    "input[type=checkbox]"
  )

  /* PRECONDITIONS */
  expect(queryByTestId(LOOKUP_WRAPPER_TESTID)).not.toBeInTheDocument()
  expect(checkBoxActual.checked).toEqual(false)

  /* ACTION */
  fireEvent.click(checkBoxActual)

  /* VERIFY */
  expect(checkBoxActual.checked).toEqual(true)
  expect(queryByTestId(LOOKUP_WRAPPER_TESTID)).toBeInTheDocument()
})

The two line where things get really interesting are:

const serviceAreaCheckbox = getByTestId("service-area-checkbox")
const checkBoxActual = serviceAreaCheckbox.querySelector(
  "input[type=checkbox]"
)

We can get the Checkbox component with the first line, but this only gets us the label wrapper and not the actual checkbox, so the second line pulls up the actual checkbox from within it.

The rendered code from the Checkbox component looks like this:

<label
  class="sc-kAzzGY dXoiwv"
  data-testid="service-area-checkbox"
>
  <input
    class="sc-cSHVUG bYZObx"
    type="checkbox"
  />

  service_location.label
</label>

The funky looking classes are the result of style-components . What’s interesting to note is that the data-testid was placed on the label node. Using querySelector let’s me pull out the actual checkbox, which is an HTML element of type “checkbox”.

From there, verifying the preconditions and postconditions becomes fairly easy:

queryByTestId

Making the change happens with the fireEvent.click . ( Note: the change event doesn’t work for checkboxes. See: https://github.com/testing-library/react-testing-library/pull/178/files#diff-04c6e90faac2675aa89e2176d2eec7d8R631 ) (and beware the drift of time as well…)

Verifying a checkbox is en-/disabled based on another value

This case shows something a little different, and shows how to approach changing props as related to component testing.

The code under test in this case is:

const SmsNotifications = ({ name, value, onChange, isMobileSet }) => {
  return (
    <FormField name={name} label={null}>
      <div>
        <strong>{I18n.t("notify_via_sms.title", { scope: i18nScope })}</strong>
        <Checkbox
          name={name}
          value={value || ""}
          onChange={onChange}
          disabled={isMobileSet ? null : "disabled"}
          wrap={"wrap"}
          data-testid="notify-via-sms-checkbox"
        >
          {" "}
          {I18n.t("notify_via_sms.label", { scope: i18nScope })}
        </Checkbox>
      </div>
    </FormField>
  )
}

The spec test for this feature is:

it("enables the notify via sms checkbox when the mobile field has a value", () => {
  const NOTIFY_CHECKBOX_TESTID = "notify-via-sms-checkbox"

  const props = {
    fields: {},
    handleChange: jest.fn(),
    onDuplicateCustomerName: jest.fn(),
    onSelectParent: jest.fn()
  }
  const { queryByTestId, getByTestId, rerender } = render(
    <Providers>
      <CustomerInfoFormSection {...props} />
    </Providers>
  )
  const notifyCheckBoxComponent = getByTestId(NOTIFY_CHECKBOX_TESTID)
  const checkBoxActual = notifyCheckBoxComponent.querySelector(
    "input[type=checkbox]"
  )
  expect(checkBoxActual.disabled).toEqual(true)

  rerender(
    <Providers>
      <CustomerInfoFormSection {...props} fields={{ mobile: "555121" }} />
    </Providers>
  )

  expect(checkBoxActual.disabled).toEqual(false)
})

I’m doing the same trick as before about grabbing the actual checkbox by using querySelect on the element returned with getByTestId("NOTIFY_CHECKBOX_TESTID") . This provides access to the disabled property.

This test uses the testing library’s rerender method, which is used to apply different props. In this case the props for the compoonent are controlled above this component, so this is actually a valid test matching how it would work in the user’s environment.

For the rerender, I’m passing in a value for the mobile phone number, which is used to determine whether the checkbox is en-/disabled.


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK