50

GitHub - intel-go/bytebuf: Replacement for bytes.Buffer that you can use in a pe...

 5 years ago
source link: https://github.com/intel-go/bytebuf
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

README.md

bytebuf

Replacement for bytes.Buffer that you can use in a performance-sensitive parts or your Go programs.

For explanation why this package is needed, see rationale.

Quick start / Installation

go get -u github.com/intel-go/bytebuf

The only difference from bytes.Buffer is explicit constructor:

buf := bytebuf.New() // Can't just use zero value
// Now can use as an ordinary bytes.Buffer:
buf.WriteString("123")
buf.Write([]byte("456")

Performance

Given this code:

buf.Write(s)
globalString = buf.String()

Where s is:

Label Data empty "" 5 "Intel" 64 64-byte string 128 128-byte string 1024 1024-byte string
name            old time/op    new time/op    delta
String/empty-8     138ns ±13%      24ns ± 0%   -82.94%  (p=0.000 n=10+8)
String/5-8         186ns ±11%      60ns ± 1%   -67.82%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
String/64-8        225ns ±10%     108ns ± 6%   -52.26%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
String/128-8       474ns ±17%     338ns ±13%   -28.57%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
String/1024-8      889ns ± 0%     740ns ± 1%   -16.78%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)

name            old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
String/empty-8      112B ± 0%        0B       -100.00%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
String/5-8          117B ± 0%        5B ± 0%   -95.73%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
String/64-8         176B ± 0%       64B ± 0%   -63.64%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
String/128-8        368B ± 0%      256B ± 0%   -30.43%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
String/1024-8     2.16kB ± 0%    2.05kB ± 0%    -5.19%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

name            old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
String/empty-8      1.00 ± 0%      0.00       -100.00%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
String/5-8          2.00 ± 0%      1.00 ± 0%   -50.00%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
String/64-8         2.00 ± 0%      1.00 ± 0%   -50.00%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
String/128-8        3.00 ± 0%      2.00 ± 0%   -33.33%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
String/1024-8       3.00 ± 0%      2.00 ± 0%   -33.33%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

Note: it requres CL133375 to be applied to your Go compiler.

Implementation difference / Rationale

The whole implementation difference can be described as:

type Buffer struct {
	buf       []byte   // contents are the bytes buf[off : len(buf)]
	off       int      // read at &buf[off], write at &buf[len(buf)]
- 	bootstrap [64]byte // memory to hold first slice; helps small buffers avoid allocation.
+ 	bootstrap *[64]byte // memory to hold first slice; helps small buffers avoid allocation.
	lastRead  readOp   // last read operation, so that Unread* can work correctly.
}

With updated escape analysis, it's possible to actually take benefits of bootstrap array, but only if it's not "inlined" into Buffer object. So, we need a pointer to array instead of normal array.

This makes it impossible to use zero value though, hence New function. Unfortunately, it means that we can't merge this into golang bytes package, it would be a breaking change in package API.

If you're interested in bootstrap array problem, take a look at cmd/compile, bytes: bootstrap array causes bytes.Buffer to always be heap-allocated.


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK