59

TinyGo – Go compiler(based on LLVM) for microcontrollers

 6 years ago
source link: https://www.tuicool.com/articles/hit/E3AJ7ne
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

TinyGo - Go compiler for microcontrollers

We never expected Go to be an embedded language and so it's got serious problems [...].

-- Rob Pike, GopherCon 2014 Opening Keynote

TinyGo is a project to bring Go to microcontrollers and small systems with a single processor core. It is similar to emgo but a major difference is that I want to keep the Go memory model (which implies garbage collection of some sort). Another difference is that TinyGo uses LLVM internally instead of emitting C, which hopefully leads to smaller and more efficient code and certainly leads to more flexibility.

My original reasoning was: if Python can run on microcontrollers, then certainly Go should be able to and run on even lower level micros.

Example program (blinky):

import "machine"

func main() {
	led := machine.GPIO{machine.LED}
	led.Configure(machine.GPIOConfig{Mode: machine.GPIO_OUTPUT})
	for {
		led.Low()
		runtime.Sleep(runtime.Millisecond * 1000)

		led.High()
		runtime.Sleep(runtime.Millisecond * 1000)
	}
}

Currently supported features:

  • control flow
  • many (but not all) basic types: most ints, strings, structs
  • function calling
  • interfaces for basic types (with type switches and asserts)
  • goroutines (very initial support)
  • function pointers (non-blocking)

Not yet supported:

  • float, complex, etc.
  • maps
  • slices
  • interface methods
  • garbage collection
  • defer
  • closures
  • channels
  • introspection (if it ever gets implemented)
  • standard library (needs more language support)
  • ...

Analysis

The goal is to reduce code size (and increase performance) by performing all kinds of whole-program analysis passes. The official Go compiler doesn't do a whole lot of analysis (except for escape analysis) becauses it needs to be fast, but embedded programs are necessarily smaller so it becomes practical. And I think especially program size can be reduced by a large margin when actually trying to optimize for it.

Implemented analysis passes:

  • Check which functions are blocking. Blocking functions a functions that call sleep, chan send, etc. It's parents are also blocking.
  • Check whether the scheduler is needed. It is only needed when there are go statements for blocking functions.
  • Check whether a given type switch or type assert is possible with type-based alias analysis . I would like to use flow-based alias analysis in the future.

report

Recommend

About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK