![](/style/images/good.png)
![](/style/images/bad.png)
Introducing Incus [LWN.net]
source link: https://lwn.net/Articles/940684/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Introducing Incus
After some discussion with Aleksa and a fair bit of encouragement from our community, we have made the decision to take Incus under the umbrella of Linux Containers and will commit to it the infrastructure which was previously made available to LXD.The goal of Incus is to provide a fully community led alternative to Canonical's LXD as well as providing an opportunity to correct some mistakes that were made during LXD's development which couldn't be corrected without breaking backward compatibility.
In addition to Aleksa, the initial set of maintainers for Incus will include Christian Brauner, Serge Hallyn, Stéphane Graber and Tycho Andersen, effectively including the entire team that once created LXD.
(Log in to post comments)
Introducing Incus
Posted Aug 7, 2023 15:12 UTC (Mon) by atnot (subscriber, #124910) [Link]
It seems canonical is intent on destroying any remaining goodwill they have left in the community so: Long live Incus, may LXD go the way of all other projects where canonical thought they could just go on their own.
Introducing Incus
Posted Aug 7, 2023 15:51 UTC (Mon) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630) [Link]
Based on what interaction I've had with Canonical management, I'm not surprised they'd pull this kind of alienating move.
Introducing Incus
Posted Aug 7, 2023 16:41 UTC (Mon) by geofft (subscriber, #59789) [Link]
> As I’ve told colleagues and upper management, Canonical isn’t the company I excitedly joined back in 2011 and it’s not a company that I would want to join today, therefore it shouldn’t be a company that I keep working for either.
Introducing Incus
Posted Aug 7, 2023 21:06 UTC (Mon) by flussence (subscriber, #85566) [Link]
What's left that hasn't completely shrivelled into W95-era Microsoft behaviour? SuSE? Anyone know what they're up to? I assume no news is good news but I'm bracing to be wrong.
Introducing Incus
Introducing Incus
Posted Aug 8, 2023 5:31 UTC (Tue) by ceplm (subscriber, #41334) [Link]
As far as I know we are just doing the same: preparing new distro(-s), continuing working on our rolling distro, just going on, looking slightly bewildered what the world around us is doing.
(and concerning Red Hat: no, I don’t like their decisions about CentOS, but I really do not think that it is an evilness on the same level as what Canonical did here).
Introducing Incus
Posted Aug 8, 2023 12:47 UTC (Tue) by ringerc (subscriber, #3071) [Link]
Introducing Incus
Posted Aug 8, 2023 13:09 UTC (Tue) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630) [Link]
Wow, very presumptuous that you think you can speak on behalf of... you cat. :)
Introducing Incus
Posted Aug 7, 2023 16:40 UTC (Mon) by Conan_Kudo (subscriber, #103240) [Link]
Will the LinuxContainers.org site stop using the Canonical-owned visual styling? For the uninformed, it makes it look like Canonical is the sponsor and supporter of the project.
Introducing Incus
Posted Aug 7, 2023 17:34 UTC (Mon) by highvoltage (subscriber, #57465) [Link]
Introducing Incus
Posted Aug 7, 2023 18:13 UTC (Mon) by stgraber (subscriber, #57367) [Link]
So that's why despite not being branded as something belonging to Canonical or Ubuntu, it still has that feel.
I'd be very happy to see a PR that changes things back to regular Bootstrap though, and I've had some interactions on Mattermost with someone who's planning on contributing exactly that, so hopefully soon!
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK