7

Github resolve: Simplify collection of traits in scope by petrochenkov · Pull Re...

 3 years ago
source link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80765
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Contributor

petrochenkov commented 24 days ago

edited

"Traits in scope" for a given location are collected by walking all scopes in type namespace, collecting traits in them and pruning traits that don't have an associated item with the given name and namespace.

Previously we tried to prune traits using some kind of hygienic resolution for associated items, but that was complex and likely incorrect, e.g. in #80762 correction to visibilites of trait items caused some traits to not be in scope anymore.
I previously had some comments and concerns about this in #65351.

In this PR we are doing some much simpler pruning based on Symbol and Namespace comparisons, it should be enough to throw away 99.9% of unnecessary traits.
It is not necessary for pruning to be precise because for trait aliases, for example, we don't do any pruning at all, and precise hygienic resolution for associated items needs to be done in typeck anyway.

The somewhat unexpected effect is that trait imports introduced by macros 2.0 now bring traits into scope due to the removed hygienic check on associated item names.
I'm not sure whether it is desirable or not, but I think it's acceptable for now.
The old check was certainly incorrect because macros 2.0 did bring trait aliases into scope.
If doing this is not desirable, then we should come up with some other way to avoid bringing traits from macros 2.0 into scope, that would accommodate for trait aliases as well.


The PR also contains a couple of pure refactorings

  • Scope walk is done by using visit_scopes instead of a hand-rolled version.
  • Code is restructured to accomodate for rustdoc that also wants to query traits in scope, but doesn't want to filter them by associated items at all.

r? @matthewjasper


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK