38

A new kernel polling interface

 5 years ago
source link: https://www.tuicool.com/articles/hit/rIruU3f
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
LWN.net needs you!

Without subscribers, LWN would simply not exist. Please consider signing up for a subscription and helping to keep LWN publishing

By Jonathan Corbet

January 9, 2018

Polling a set of file descriptors to see which ones can perform I/O without blocking is a useful thing to do — so useful that the kernel provides three different system calls ( select() , poll() , and epoll_wait()

— plus some variants) to perform it. But sometimes three is not enough; there is now a proposal circulating for a fourth kernel polling interface. As is usually the case, the motivation for this change is performance.

On January 4, Christoph Hellwig posteda new polling API based on the asynchronous I/O (AIO) mechanism. This may come as a surprise to some, since AIO is not the most loved of kernel interfaces and it tends not to get a lot of attention. AIO allows for the submission of I/O operations without waiting for their completion; that waiting can be done at some other time if need be. The kernel has had AIO support since the 2.5 days, but it has always been somewhat incomplete. Direct file I/O (the original use case) works well, as does network I/O. Many other types of I/O are not supported for asynchronous use, though; attempts to use the AIO interface with them will yield synchronous behavior. In a sense, polling is a natural addition to AIO; the whole point of polling is usually to avoid waiting for operations to complete.

The patches add a new command ( IOCB_CMD_POLL ) that can be passed in an I/O control block (IOCB) to io_submit() along with any of the usual POLL* flags describing the type of I/O that is desired — POLLIN for data available to read, for example. This command, like other AIO commands, will not (necessarily) complete before io_submit() returns. Instead, when the indicated file descriptor is ready for the requested type of I/O, a completion event will be queued. A subsequent call to io_getevents() (or the io_pgetevents() variant, added by the patch set, that blocks signals during the operation) will return that event, and the calling application will know that it can perform I/O on the indicated file descriptor. AIO poll operations always operate in the "one-shot" mode; once a poll notification has been generated, a new IOCB_CMD_POLL IOCB must be submitted for that file descriptor if further notifications are needed.

Thus far, this interface sounds more difficult to use than the existing poll system calls. There is a payoff, though, that comes in the form of the AIO ring buffer. This poorly documented aspect of the AIO subsystem maps a circular buffer into the calling process's address space. That process can then consume notification events directly from the buffer rather than calling io_getevents() . Multiple notifications can be consumed without the need to enter the kernel at all, and polling for multiple file descriptors can be re-established with a single io_submit() call. The result, Hellwig said in the patch posting, is an up-to-10% improvement in the performance of the Seastar I/O framework. More recently, henoted that the improvement grows to 16% on kernels withpage-table isolation turned on.

Internally to the kernel, any device driver (or other subsystem that exports a file_operations structure) can support the new poll interface, but some small changes will be required. It is not, however, necessary to support (or even know about) AIO in general. In current kernels, the polling system calls are all supported by the poll() method in struct file_operations :

int (*poll) (struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *table);

This function must perform two actions: setting up notifications for when the underlying file is ready for I/O, and returning the types of I/O that could be performed without blocking now. The first is done by adding one or more wait queues to the provided table ; the driver will perform a wakeup call on one of those queues when the state of the device changes. The current readiness state is the return value from the poll() method itself.

Supporting AIO-based polling requires splitting those two functions into separate file_operations methods. Thus, there are two new entries to that structure:

struct wait_queue_head *(*get_poll_head)(struct file *file, int mask);
    int (*poll_mask) (struct file *file, int mask);

(The actual patches use the new typedef __poll_t for the mask , but that typedef isn't in the mainline kernel yet). The polling subsystem will call get_poll_head() to obtain a pointer to the wait queue that will be notified when the device's I/O readiness state changes; poll_mask() will be called to get the current readiness state. A driver that implements these two operations need not (and probably should not) retain its implementation of the older poll() interface.

One potential limitation built into this API is that there can only be a single wait queue that receives notifications for a given file . The current interface, instead, allows multiple queues to be used, and a number of drivers take advantage of that fact to use, for example, different queues for read and write readiness. Contemporary wait queues offer enough flexibility that the use of multiple queues should not be necessary anymore. If a driver cannot be changed, Hellwig said, " the driver just won't support aio poll "

There have not been a lot of comments in response to the patch posting so far; many of the relevant developers have been preoccupied with other issues in the last week. It is hard to argue with a 10% performance improvement, though, so some form of this patch seems likely to get into the mainline sooner or later — interested parties can keep checking the mainline repository to see if it's there yet. Whether we'll see a fifth polling interface added in the future is anybody's guess, though.

( Log in

to post comments)


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK